Quantcast
Channel: Dionysian Atavism
Viewing all 138 articles
Browse latest View live

Memo from the Black Brotherhood #4

$
0
0
“The unjustly injured are not benefited if the same injury is inflicted on the aggressor: punishment should not only be corrective but compensatory to the victim. This does not preclude other kinds of deterrents if necessary.
If you must murder, seek the murderers; meet evil with evil, even unto yourself.”
- Austin Osman Spare, The Logomachy of Zos.
And what should we do about predators loping about about in our midst?

Here are the Basalt Tower of Chorazin, we've always been of the mind that it is your personal responsibilityto ensure the safety of your family, and fellow practitioners as well.

Rapists, pedophiles, and other such predators should not be tolerated. And should it be discovered that they have harmedthose you love, they should be put to the (perhaps proverbial) sword.

Cursed until the Law catches up: forced into an infinite spotlight which refuses to allow them to hide or cloak their actions in any way. Bound into silence and forced apart from the community they have taken advantage of until their dues have paid, and perhaps still viewed askance long after.

We are, after all, perfectly comfortable with the malefic aspects of magic. Are not such times the very reason we have such terrible tools in our toolbox?

We strongly suspect that the answer is obvious, and that attempting to blame the victimsor pretend that some celebrity is a “good guy” after inflicting harm on another (often while insisting that “no one would ever do that!” – we have heard that argument many, many times before) is far worse than the most abominable black magic one might ever decide to practice... Unless, of course, said “black magic” involves inflicting such harm simply because one can. Many of us will never understand the latter standpoint, aside from when it is spouted by those who have confused “mastery of the self” with “mastery of the world.”

Isn't this all about power, and aren't you arguing a point based on taking power?”

We have always held the outlook that the profoundly disempowered should first work on their own mind (“your mind is a Fortress of Solitude, and you are totally Superman/Woman/Other”), and then they should take power back for themselves. And that to deny that right to take power back for themselves, even if it is only within the mind of the practitioner, is a rather horrible assertion... And one which benefits those who harm far more than those who have been harmed.

We have often asserted that those who can gain the most from our practices are those who have been disempoweredat some point in their lives and refuse to allow this situation to return. No spirit, no other person, can givethis to you. You must feel secure in yourself to take the step, and then you must take that step. And you must always remain aware that there is somethingyou can do.

Again and again the question arises:
Aren't you arguing that we should 'control' situations?”

We do not assert that any such ability to controlexists in any situation. Rather, you are always capable of influencing that situation for better or worse. The problem remains that once you have influenced a situation, you are responsible for that influence and what comes about. But that does not change our outlook on this matter.

Power is both a personal and collectivematter, and influence is transient. It can be used for corrupt reasons, or to bring about a swift resolution in relatively terrible matters that we would not wish upon our worst enemies.

As in all things, balance does matter.

Nonetheless, what lies at the core is the resolve to act... or not act. As in all things, such decisions are situational and lie with the individual or the community.

There remain a great many who, incapable of looking into the eye of the storm and seeing what is happening around them, will attempt to insist on reasons not to act. Occasionally, they are wise in this regard... But typically they are simply giving power to those who have clearly chosen to use it for harmful reasons. That is a matter of the blind leading the blind.

We see no reason to join them in sailing on their Ship o' Fools. We rather suspect that it will sink, shortly, drowning all those who have failed to apply empathy to survivors... And have instead chosen to give it to their favorite celebrities. We name them “Abomination” and wash our hands of them.

Finally, we would also add that an appropriate influence that one can alwayschoose to unleash is to aid those who have survived the harmful events they find themselves mired in so that they might find the solace of friends, and the conditions necessary to heal terrible wounds. Even if one chooses notto put predators to the sword, there is always an action to take on behalf of those who have been harmed.

We see no reason as to why so many have failed in this regard. And we, the loathed Brotherhood of Darkness, cannot possibly comprehend the “side” some have chosen to take.

In Mars and Saturn we place our trust,
Jack Faust.
Chief of Public Relations for the Black Brotherhood.
The Basalt Tower of Chorazin, upon the edge of theSea of Galilee.

[EDIT: Due to backchatter, I will clarify this post. I'm honestly not a member of the "Black Brotherhood," but many years ago was accused of it... A lot, actually. As such I began writing tongue-in-cheek posts under the "memos" moniker while arguing that one meditate, practice theurgy, etc. This time, I decided to be a lot more serious... Because certain topics and individuals have made me literally feel ill on this matter. I felt that given my rather malefic stance on the matter, it was deserving of a "memo" post. But it's still a struggle to write this crap without flipping my shit and screaming "DESTROY THE INFIDELS!!!" ... so the post is admittedly choppy.]

Beans & The Dead.

$
0
0
A recent discussion with the Thiasos of the Starry Bull briefly involved prohibitions regarding beans by certain cults (some Orphic sects, and more importantly, the Pythagoreans). I seemed to recall that the bean was discussed by Jake Stratton-Kent in the Geosophia, but couldn't find the relevant section.

EDIT: I found the relevant section. Geosophia, volume 2, p. 204:
 “Ovid tells us in his Fasti that at midnight the head of the family rose and made a sign with the thumb inside closed fingers (the Sign of the Fig) to be free of fear of meeting a ghost and after washing his hands in spring water he took nine black beans and either threw them over his shoulder or more likely held them in his mouth and spat them out, being careful not to look behind him,  as is usual with many chthonic rituals. After this he spoke the incantation nine times: haec ego emitto; his redimo meque meosque fabis (with these beans I redeem me and mine). Washing his hands again he and probably others of the holsehold beat metal pots together like cymbals, walking through the house saying nine times: Manes exite paterni! (Family ghosts, depart!)

The same type of beans were also cast onto graves of the deceased or burned as an incense of exoricsm, the smell being disagreeable to the spirits; incantations were muttered and drums and metal pots beaten.”

Over the weekend, however, I recalled that Pliny the Elder had discussed the bean (albeit in brief) in The Natural History (Book XVIII, chapter 30):
“In our ancient ceremonials, too, bean pottage occupies its place in the religious services of the gods. Beans are mostly eaten together with other food, but it is generally thought that they dull the senses, and cause sleepless nights attended with dreams. Hence it is that the bean has been condemned by Pythagoras; though, according to some, the reason for this denunciation was the belief which he entertained that the souls of the dead are enclosed in the bean: it is for this reason, too, that beans are used in the funereal banquets of the Parentalia. According to Varro, it is for a similar cause that the Flamen abstains from eating beans: in addition to which, on the blossom of the bean, there are certain letters of ill omen to be found.”
 Simoons, in Plants of Life, Plants of Death has this to say of the bean:
“The association of beans and other legumes with death and the dead has survived in modern times in Europe. A prime example of this is their use as funeral foods in various places. In the past in certain parts of Berry as well as in the neighboring Marche in central France, for example, people always included a dish of beans or dried peas among the items served at a funeral dinner. In the Marches of central Italy, a family coming back from the burial joined in eating a large plate of kidney beans. Beans were also a major element of funeral dishes in Sardinia. In parts of the Friuli in northeastern Italy, it was customary for people to eat bean soup on the day the dead are commemorated. Elsewhere a special bread or cake that includes rye and vetch (likely Vicia sativa, a relative of the fava beans) has been served to persons who come to pray for the dead person. After a funeral in the Fimini region of northern Italy, the mourners returned to the home of the deceased for a funerary dinner which consisted of chick-pea soup. The serving provided for the deceased was later consumed by a member of the family. As for eastern Europe, I have uncovered a fragmentary report of beans having had ties with the dead among the Slavic people, too. I refer to an account of the former Polish-Russian province of Pintschov, where beans and honey were considered foods of the dead, and at memorial dinners, food consisted of beans and peas boiled in honey-water.

Beans and other legumes have also been used in Europe on All Souls' Day...” (P. 251 – 252.)
He goes on at length, eventually discussing funerary honey-cakes and the like. I have a few other sources to dig up, which if found, will require a second entry. But that's no bother. I'll add more later if/when I come across it.

Jack.

Beans & the Dead: Part II

$
0
0
“Whether the souls of men after death are or are not in the world below, is a question which may be argued in this manner: The ancient doctrine of which I have been speaking affirms that they go from this into the other world, and return hither, and are born from the dead. Now if this be true, and the living come from the dead, then our souls must be in the other world, for if not, how could they be born again?”
- Plato, Phaedo.

“Wretches, utter wretches, keep your hands from beans!”
- Empedocles.
While I just wrapped up the last entry on beans and the dead, it seemed insufficient compared to the rather extensive list of associations found with the beans. As such, I felt that a second entry should be prepared with a range of sources – from academic to magical – involving the item.

One of these is the – though dated – excellent article by Alfred C. Andrews entitled The Bean in Indo-European Totemism (1949). The article itself is too long to quote in its entirety, but can be found for download by way of the provided link. There is no reason not to quote chunks of the article, however:
“The sacrifices made to the old Italic deity Carna on the first of June consisted of bean-meal and lard, and this day was known as the Kalendae fabariae. Beans were also used to lay ghosts at the Lemuria and figured in the sacrifices performed at the Parentalia. Beans also played a role in magic rites conducted in connection with Tacita or Muta, a goddess of the dead, and must have been used at a festival of the dead in honor of the bean goddess Fabola or Fabula. The Priest of Jupiter was forbidden to touch a bean or even to mention its name. The name of Fufetia, an early Vestal, as well as that of Mettius Fufetius, is derived from faba by Pfund, who also identifies with it that of Modius Fabidius, reputed founder of the Cures, and even ventures to conclude that a period once existed among the early Romans when agriculture was devoted almost exclusively to beans. His argument entails ingenious analysis of Roman and Sabine land measures and is plausible in so far as it applies to beans; but there is no question that the cultivation of spelt in Italy is at least as old as that of the bean, and that puls made from spelt was probably the first staple food derived from field crops. This much at least is certain, that beans were under cultivation in Italy as early as the Neolithic age and were an important food crop for the early Romans. It is indeed by no means improbable that the bean was their first cultivated vegetable.”

[...]

“One significant and provocative factor, with respect to this abstention, is that the ancients felt toward beans a mingled respect and dread, a complex of emotions suggested by the Greek term ίερός, which apparently was generally applied to an object believed to be charged with some supernatural force, contact with which might be either beneficial or harmful. Today we generally call this mysterious power mana in its helpful aspect and taboo in its harmful aspect, Beans belonged in the category of objects possessing both mana and taboo.

The ancients advanced most divergent explanations for the taboo on beans some religious or spiritual, some dietetic or hygienic. Aristotle (or his source) proposes no fewer than five different explanations, without settling on any one of them. The heart of the problem is to determine whether this ambivalent attitude toward beans is an echo of earlier totemism or whether it is of different origin.

With the concept of totemism in mind, one sees a glimmer of sense in Horace’s allusion to the faba Pythagorae cognata and in the perplexing Pythagorean maxim, “It is an equal crime to eat beans and the heads of one’s parents.” It now seems clearer, too, why Pythagoras forbade his followers to eat beans as being human flesh, on the ground that beans were occupied by the souls of the dead and thereby took on the qualities of human flesh. As Pliny says, “The souls of the dead are in them.”

If we accept this notion of beans being the residence of the souls of the dead as the original, primitive concept, diverse and apparently conflicting beliefs and practices current in the historic period take on sense and consistency. The simplest and most direct development was the notion that beans assumed the character of human flesh, as the result of the presence of souls in them. By this presence beans were rendered dynamic receptacles of generative power, and we accordingly find peeled green beans compared to human testicles and even said to be the generative principle itself, the abstinence of the Pythagoreans explained as due to the resemblance of beans to testicles, the beans of Empedocles interpreted as an esoteric or symbolic allusion to testicles, and beans alleged to resemble eggs in embodying the generative principle...”

[…]

“The basic concept of beans as the abode of the souls of the dead created an intimate association of beans with death and gave rise to strict rules for priests concerned with the life principle. Thus the Priest of Jupiter, whose functions required scrupulous avoidance of contact with the dead and everything associated with them, was forbidden, as we have seen, to touch a bean or even to speak its name. It is therefore puzzling to read that beans were regularly eaten at funerary banquets, funerary sacrifices, and invocations to the deceased, for few things are more intimately associated with death than such ceremonies as these.”

[…]

“Beans were conceived to be the abodes of the souls of the dead, but we must be careful not to think of these souls in terms of Christian theology as eternal entities possessing the attributes of the physical beings in which they once lodged. We must rather visualize them as modicums of the life principle, vague and intangible, released from the body at the moment of death. This packet of force, if we may so term it, was both beneficent and maleficent. If it entered an alien organism, it could produce malign effects; but it could be absorbed with benefit by a related organism.

At the moment of death the soul or life principle of a Roman escaped from his body by way of his mouth, and the next of kin caught and inhaled this last exhalation, absorbing the life principle. This could be done not only without danger, but with actual benefit, for the two organisms were closely related. But death is dangerous, inimical to life, and a person needed all the extra vitality he could obtain from any source, not only on occasions directly associated with death, such as mortuary banquets, but even when making funerary sacrifices and conducting invocations to the deceased. Therefore he ate beans, as containing the life principle. In this connection, we may well stress again the statement of Pliny that the animae mortuorum, i.e., the breath-souls of the dead, were in beans. And since beans contained a life force, it was natural for them to be eaten on Carna’s day to insure good digestion and health for the coming year.”
And so forth. Honestly, despite objections might have to the recurrent themes of Indo-European totemism in the article, it still remains one of the more fascinating places to look for information on beans and their associations with the dead.

Given wide-spread associations with beans as being both a generative force and a container for the soul, it is rather surprising that beans don't factor in any of the PGM spells and rituals involving the dead. Rather one finds them in the PGM spells for contraception:

PGM LXIII. 24-25:
A contraceptive: Pick up a bean that has a small bug in it, and attach it as an amulet.

PGM LXIII. 26-28
A contraceptive: Take a pierced bean and attach it as an amulet after tying it up in a piece of mule hide.
(Betz, P. 295).
Dioscorides, meanwhile, merely notes that beans may cause “bad dreams.”

Be that as it may, the bean does feature in spells and rituals in later magical literature, such as the Grimorium Verum:

To make yourself invisible:
Begin this operation on a Wednesday before sunrise, then take seven black beans and a human skull. Put one bean in the mouth of the skull, two in the nostrils, two in the eyes, and two in the ears. Next make on the head the characters show. (Note: characters omitted. See text for reference.) Then bury the skull so it faces the sky.

For nine days before sunrise, sprinkle it with excellent brandy. On the eighth day, you will find there the spirit of the deceased who will awake, and will ask you: “What are you doing here?” You will answer: “I am watering my plant,” and it will take the bottle, saying, “Given me this bottle so I may water it.” You should refuse this demand, and it will ask you again, but you must continue to refuse until he stretches out his hand, and there you will see figures similar to the ones you made on the head hanging from the tips of his fingers. In this case, you may be assured that this is the true spirit of the head.

This is done because some other spirit could surprise you, causing you harm and causing the operation to be in vain.

When you give him the bottle of liquor, he will water it himself, and you can retire. On the following day, which is the ninth day, return and you will find that the bean crop has matured. Harvest them and put them in your mouth, watching yourself in a mirror, and when you find one that makes you not see yourself, this bean will be a good one to save. You can also try them in the mouth of a child. A note that all those which don't work should be buried with the head.”
(Joseph H. Peterson translation, p. 49. Also see Jake Stratton-Kent's discussion on altering the spell for other purposes in the True Grimoire.)
A certain Mr. Smith notes:
Grimm's Teutonic Mythology, Appendix, states that beans should not be eaten during the weihnachten(12 nights of Yule).”

This particularly stood out to me due to something in the earlier cited text by Alfred C. Andrews:
“It is interesting to note in this connection that the custom of electing by lot a King and often also a Queen of the Bean on Twelfth Night or the eve thereof used to prevail in France, Belgium, Germany, and England. It can be traced back to the first half of the sixteenth century and probably dates from much more remote antiquity.”
Later he adds:
“Their use in Athenian elections by lots is probably of too recent origin to be attributed to any such notion and was probably motivated merely by convenience; but the use of beans in taking the auspices among the Romans is a relic of earlier times and may embody some such belief. One may note also the custom of ancient diviners of placing salt and beans before their clients. This practice has persisted into modern times, so that we find beans used for divination on Midsummer Eve in the Azores and for the same purpose on Twelfth Night in many other places.”

Meanwhile, for a bit of syncretism with magical practices in the Americas, Mr. Stratton-Kent notes:
“In comparative approaches its interesting that beans are also employed in offerings to Omolu, a god of the cemetery in Kimbanda. Pretty sure that's only one New World example, just happens to be the most immediate for me.

Roles for a single type of black beans and of diverse beans varying in colour might be differentiated; black beans are often used directly in magic, while multi-coloured beans appear as offerings.”

While I cannot claim this entry answers questions about all the different associations between beans, generative forces, and the dead, it will hopefully give others a few places to look. It is also worth noting that Macrobius's Saturnaliadetails a number of Roman festivals and rites involving beans, which may also be worth looking into.

Jack.

Divine Intoxication, Inspiration, and Offerings. [EDITED]

$
0
0
Come, blessed Dionysius [Dionysos], various nam'd, bull-fac'd,
begot from Thunder, Bacchus [Bakkhos] fam'd.
Bassarian God, of universal might, whom swords, and blood, and sacred rage delight:
In heav'n rejoicing, mad, loud-sounding God, furious inspirer, bearer of the rod:
By Gods rever'd, who dwell'st with human kind, propitious come, with much-rejoicing mind.
- Orphic Hymn to
Dionysus Bassareus Triennalis. (Taylor translation.)
I should be working on something else, but I'm still blissed out from doing work earlier. Being that it was Memorial Day, I wanted to offer some alcohol to the dead. Not just to the soldiers that have fallen in foreign lands, far from their place of birth, but to the heroes and protectors of my city, and of myself as well.

I spend a lot of time talking about the potential dangers of the restless dead. And I don't spend nearly enough time talking about the bliss of existing beside them after an orgiastic ritual, where I have partaken of the divine sacraments (read: alcohol, and other intoxicants, perhaps), danced beside them, and offered them 'the good stuff.'

Flowers. Cool water. Sweet fruits. Honey. Chocolates. Alcohol (of various assortments, no less!). Tobacco. Cannabis. Coffee.

I sing praises to them, and thank them for their blessings. I enter into trance and sometimes catch the glimmers of light, and radiance of the Other World that shines around them.

And, as a Dionysian, every time I drink, I salute them. I understand that I am actively in their presence. That the intoxication that floods through my life, my brain, my body, stretches back into my thundering blood and to my ancestors which came before me.

The friends that passed before me, and the initiates of my tradition of witchcraft which are now amongst the Mighty Dead are saluted.

The very essence of the alcohol can, at times, be a trigger for this. Whenever I have mead, I can feel my ancestors and even divinities above them shifting a bit closer, subtly. I am in the presence of the divine, and amongst it are even the former human beings that are a part of the great chains binding together the universe.

And when it hits, I am exposed to the experience of those who came before. To little subtle bits of he universe that I've failed to notice. To the little beautiful elements that I've somehow missed. It might be a smell, or a feeling, or it might be information (historical, magical, or just plain in and of itself) that I've somehow missed.

It is true: the songs I sing may well be foreign; the things I offer may be different. The steps in my dances, and circular movements, and my dedications may be strange to the spirits around me. If it is a problem, they'll make it clear to me. If it isn't, then they don't give a shit and I haven't messed up. This is an on-going learning process for me. Each subtle essence, each thing encountered, is different from others. You can't approach work with individual or groups of spirits – whatever the kind – as a type of monolithic practice from which there is only one acceptable way, and any deviation from that is a terrible abomination.

So more and more, I find myself breaking out the divination techniques. Trying to trust my intuition, but also not over-think it. Thankfully, eventually the intoxication – ranging from purely mental to physical – will intervene and it won't matter anymore, anyway.

Then there's just the work, the presence, and the joy.

Even if I were to appear to be alone, I am amongst a vast and great company. And I wouldn't have it any other way.

Jack.

The Light in the Underworld

$
0
0
Venus and Tannhauser by Laurence Koe.
Opening Remarks
I began working on this entry a while ago and paused. But I just witnessed a discussion on the entire “Right Hand Path” versus “Left Hand Path” dynamic that beguiles discussions between magicians. Frankly, I've abandoned the entire dynamic conceptually, as it is alien to the work I find myself doing. There is no reason to take outlooks from the Victorian period and apply them retroactively to the sum total of magical work that I do; therefore, I refuse to do it or to place any future stock within such outlooks.

This ties in to the topic of this blog entry, which is working planetary magick with Chthonic divinities. A few months ago, a member of an email list that I at least read regularly (although my interactions remain distant to a certain degree, because I can be an ass and do not wish to inflict that upon members) brought up the topic of plugging Chthonic deities into the planetary spheres and treating them along the traditional lines of rulership.

I want to make this clear right away: I have not taken the set I've put together from an archaic text, but rather attempted to find syncretizations or proper Chthonic deities that fit well enough with the spheres to be worked with. In other words: what you'll eventually see is completely the byproduct of my own research and ideas and I made it all up. It is not a bonafide source of ancient magic, and it is quite possible that working with my setup may cause individuals problems. If such is the case, I recommend research and coming up with your own lineup. You are, of course, free to use my own. Finally, at least one reference is largely a medieval concept, and may not jive with those predisposed to seeing the deities within an explicit timeframe limited to antiquity. On this matter, I apologize. I happen to enjoy representations of deities from multiple points in time – including after the rise of Christianity in the West – and don't feel the need to limit myself. This is in part due to being a magician: individuals such as myself have existed across the span of time, in different places and times. Being a practitioner of witchcraft also extends to this view, as many aspects of witchcraft do not exist prior to a certain period of time (around 1200 C.E., and thereafter, there is a conceptual shift that occurred in Europe that had long-term ramifications; but that would take far, far too long to discuss and elements existed before that point, too).

My work in this regard has been slightly hampered, because shortly after I came up with my set for daily work, Sannion went and released the daily lineup for the Thiasos of the Starry Bull's devotions*. As such I've found myself in the strange place of trying to work with Sannion's devotional lineup during the day, while also working with the Chthonic planetary work at night (and often at midnight)! Sometimes, I feel “off” after combining both sets of work – possibly because going from trying to dance alongside Satyrs on a Saturday and then switching to revering the fearsome form of Brimo-Hekate and her horde of terrifying specters at midnight doesn't always conceptually mesh together. Sometimes, it seems as if both practices counter-balance each other, one providing a purely underworld framework, and the other an all-encompassing Orphic framework. Long-time blog readers will probably realize that I'm very, very keen on the different cults involved in the subject of “Orphism,” and that I'm also open to entirely modern takes on the matter.

But before we get to my lineup, I want to address something: Chthonic work does not imply unending darkness, depravity, or worshiping a deity who plans to destroy the earth – although, Dionysos as a symbol of rebellion and liberation may well be keen on smashing oppressive social orders. That's part of what he does, and part of why I revere the deity so much.

The concepts of the underworld being a place of nothing but evil are anathema to my outlook. It is true that there are plenty of problematic daimons, dangerous daimons, and things you just plain shouldn't trust. The act of traveling to the crossroads at midnight to perform your devotions can be terrifying; particularly if you emulate my stance and do so on foot. You will be leaving behind many of your magical tools, your fancy altar, and instead learning an approach based on simplicity and necessity. But you certainly don't have to do that, particularly if you have a life that doesn't allow for acting in this capacity. If you do so I recommend brushing up on charms and talismans that ward off hostile visitants and dangerous daimons; learning invisibility spells, and considering using a lot of cleansing techniques involve plant materia.

Problems and Devotions.

In the long run, these things can help eliminate issues triggered by encountering hostile spirits. In some cases, hostile spirits can be won to your side with offerings of libations of sweet wine, meals (such as the Deipna Hekatates), honey, sweet fruits, and flowers. In other cases, you will have to either ensure that they cannot notice you (invisibility spells), or utter a command in the name of an appropriate deity who is willing to aid you, and perhaps even perform an exorcism. That said: nine times out of ten, I get by just fine by offering the fruits of the earthand cool water to said spirits; it is perfectly traditional (see Burkert's The Orientalizing Revolution, part two “A Seer or Healer” Magic and Medicine from East to West, specifically the lengthy discussion on Spirits of the Dead and Black Magic. Also see Ogden's Greek and Roman Necromancy, which has recurrent discussions on the matter).

The idea that even the most fearsome specters of the dead can become less-than-hostile with such simple offerings is probably baffling to some; however, both my experience is very much of that sort, and the consulting historical sources seems to bear it out, too.

The deities themselves are not problematic. They are deities; even if they are fearsome in and of themselves, they are still open to worship and devotion, and benevolent in their own ways. Some I would go so far as to call “the light in the underworld,” and surrounding them are vast swathes of other spirits that they send to and fro to do their work, some of whom radiate the same presence that is not unlike torchlight on a very dark night.

Perhaps the most stunning thing to note is that there is significant overlap between what may be given as offerings to deities of the underworld, the spirits therein (particularly the dead), and even in a few cases what might be given to the gods. Again we see a lot of offering sweet fruits, honey (which was given to the heroic dead, the restless dead, and the gods!), flowers and so forth. In some cases, offerings can also be made that were traditional to the deity in their own right, considerations of the underworld and Chthonic magic and devotion aside. It is also a very good idea to consider keeping frankincense and myrrh on hand to fumigate as part of the ritual, and make offerings thereof. Both are recurrent across the Orphic Hymns along with storax, and easily obtained today.

The Lineup**:


Sol = Apollo Soranus(potentially displaced with Asklepios; more on this another time)

The Hirpi Sorani(“wolves of Soranus”) are referenced in Virgil's Aeneid, where Arrun is considered a member of the cult, a fact particularly evident when he executes an ambush and cries the following prayer:
Apollo, most high of gods, guardian of holy Soracte, whose chief worshippers are we, for whom is fed the blaze of the pine-wood heap, while we, thy votaries, passing in strength of faith amid the fire, plant our steps on the deep embers – grant that this shame be effaced by our arms, O Father Almighty! I seek no plunder, no trophy of the maid's defeat, nor any spoils; other feats shall bring me fame; so but this dread scourge fall stricken beneath my blow, inglorious I will return to the city of my sires.”
It was also mentioned by Strabo, Pliny the Elder, Silius Italicus, Solinus, and Servius.

Once a year the cult gathered for what we would rightly call Chthonic rituals: a pile of wood would be heaped together, and lit until its embers gleamed. The Priests then walked or danced – most likely
three times– across the burning embers while barefoot. Solinus describes the priests movements as “leaping,” which is suggestive of fire-dancing, and the word used (exultant) includes a connotation of rejoicing according to Mika Rissanen. The author adds: 
The atmosphere of the ritual seems to have in fact to have been joyful rather than frightening. Silius Italicus describes Apollo being happy about the blazing piles of wood and their offerings.
All these authors point out that the priests were able to perform the ritual without burning their feet. The explanation gien by Varro, transmitted by Servius, is that the priests used medicated ointment to moisturize their soles,while Silius Italicus refers to some kind of trance that protected the priests.”
The cult seems to have centered around the region of Mt. Soracte, already appearing in the prayer delivered by Arruns in the Aeneid. Rissanen the primary inscription found at the mountain are to Apollo Soranus.

Rissanen also notes:
Ultimately, the name of the god (and thus the name of the mountain) is probably connectioned with Śuri, the Etruscan god of purification and prophecies, as suggested by G. Colonna.”
 We are also provided with a fascinating potential account in the paper linking the practices there to Dis Pater, the Roman lord of the underworld and potentially expressing an explanation for the fire dances via Servius:
It was on this mountain that a sacrifice to Dis Paterwas once performed – because it is devoted to the chthonic deities – as wolves suddenly appeared and plundered entrails from the fire. The shepherds chased the wolves for a long time, until they arrived at a cave emanating pestilential gases that killed people standing near by. The reason for the emergence of this plague was that they had chased the wolves. They received a message that they could calm it down by imitating the wolves...”***
Servius goes on to suggest that imitation of wolves meant plunder, but Rissanen seems to be against this outlook; and it hardly makes sense when considering the fire-walking or fire-dancing celebration performed by members of the cult. In Greece wolves were strongly associated with Apollo (versus Rome's Mars and his association with wolves), which probably let to the two deities (Apollo and Soranus) becoming syncretized, and the inscriptions found to the divinity at Mt. Soracte.
It is recommended that burning wood is offered during work with Apollo Soranus; possibly pine, given that Virgil explicitly connects the wood burned at the celebrations of the Hirpi Sorani to it. Additionally, given the solar aspects of white frankincense, it makes a fine offering, as well as fumigation for purification, during the work.

Luna = Persephone/Proserpina/Kore:

“The Pure Queen of Down Below,” as some of the Orphic lamellae describe her. I would hope that folks are fairly well aware of the Goddess of the Underworld, who shares her power with Hades and therefore will only recommend fumigation potentials: mugwort (being lunar), poppies (I must pause here to note that opium is linked to both Persephone and Demeter; however, that is probably out of the question and I would recommend using poppies that are not an issue to use in terms of legality). Asphodel, a plant I have never encountered outside the references to the divinity, has also been mentioned as sacred. I should probably look into the potential of growing it...

Note: in some discussions on Orphic cosmology, Persephone is treated as the mother of Dionysos (as Zagreus), due to being raped by Zeus. But... a lot of what I've seen has been based on older scholarship, which is all kinds of problematic and I'm not sure how often the two deities are linked together as mother and son, and such. I intend to find out, though.

Mars = Dionysos as Render of Men (ὰνθρωπορραίστης):

While not typically viewed as a deity involved with matters of war, Dionysos was seen as a warrior, and given several titles – like “Render of Men” – which apply to the above quite well. Granted, Dionysian War is probably quite different that the open combat of Ares. In Nonnus'Dionysiaca, it is complained that he cannot be overcome because the God of Many Forms is constantly shape-shifting – taking the form of fire, a lion, a dragon. (And who wants to fight a dragon? I mean, really?) At least one of his titles is translated as “he who delights in the sword and bloodshed” by Otto in Dionysus: Myth and Cult. This idea also appears in Taylor's translation of the Orphic Hymn to Dionysus Bassareus Triennalis(“Bassarian God, of universal might, whom swords, and blood, and sacred rage delight”). The Dionysian 'frenzy,' and capability of the Maenads to rip apart those who have angered the god – or them, in the case of Orpheus! – also ties in to my placement of Dionysos to the sphere of war, rather than to redemption. This is not to say that he is nota redeemer – the Orphic lamellae certainly make that clear (“Bacchus has released you”) – or a mediator. He is. But he is also the liberator, and patron of several slave revolts. To my mind, it is massively important to emphasize both aspects – of the mediator of Orphic redemption – and as the literal liberator of slaves, and the oppressed.

Recommended fumigations: Storax, Frankincense, Myrrh. He's the son of Zeus after all and is as worthy of being offered that which one offers a king. Additionally, grape leaves are also excellent to add to one's altar, to to slather with honey at the crossroads.

Mercurius = Hermes Chthonios

At some point, I'll talk about Hermes Chthonios with a bit more length than here. But – he's the guide of the dead. And he's fucking awesome. He's totally got an Orphic Hymn to his name. Use it.

Fumigation: Storax.

Jupiter = Zeus-Typhon/Hades.

The King of the Underworld. Do I need to expand on this? Well, maybe on the unusual looking Zeus-Typhon: Ogden links it to Hades fairly explicitly in Greek and Roman Necromancy. Unfortunately, I am completely unaware of whether cults existed that utilized the name or not. Should I ever become aware of such matters, you can rest assured that I will expand on it in a blog – or somewhere, at least.

Fumigation: Storax, Frankincense, Myrrh.

Venus = Chthonic Venus. (i.e. Venus of the medieval Venusberg)

Between late antiquity and the late medieval period, Goddesses and spirits (and even fairies) tend to start overlapping heavily. Venus as an Underworld figure becomes prominently expressed in stories such as those involving Tannhauser. The Venusberg was a mountain within which she was believed to live, in a paradise of all delights hidden beneath the surface where she was served by nymphs, and even the occasional ghost (at least in the testimony of Diel Bruell, who was executed for witchcraft). These tales go back to the Sibyllenberg, a mountain in Italy not far from Narn, Italy today. The Sibyl's mount was apparently a place where necromancers traveled to learn their arts, watched over the Sibyl (similar to one of the Sibyls training Aeneas in the Aeneidin necromancy). Far from simply being stories, we can find these overlapping ideas in Reginald Scot's The Discoverie of Witchcraft (in relation to the “Fairy Sibyllia”), in accounts given by shady sorcerers that may or may not have been charlatans, and at least one aforementioned witch trial. I've honestly blogged about the subject more than a bit, and shall leave it alone except to mention that the figure is very similar – if not the same – as one of the major spirits discussed in Jake Stratton-Kent's True Grimoire. Should this figure not work for you, I recommend defaulting to Venus Libitinawho is heavily associated with death.

Fumigation: Myrrh. (Rose petals if you're feeling experimental, although they may smell badly. Thanks VVF!)


Saturn = Hekate-Brimo, or Demeter-Brimo.

I talk about Hekate-Brimo, the “vengeful” aspect of Hekate, more than a bit, so I'll limit myself to complete this entry. She is suggested to have been called upon when one was in immense danger, or under attack by a spirit – as her mere name may have been sufficient to frighten them off. I make offerings to her regularly, and even consecrate some of the tropane-bearing plants I grow (nightshades, particularly Mandrake) to that name, as she is even more terrifying than their potential poisons. Furthermore, Jason calls upon her in the Argonautica, after performing Chthonic rites (immolation of an animal in a ritual pit) and prior to take the potion Medea has furnished for him to provide for his task.

Fumigation: Storax.

Be seeing you,
Jack.

* Note: there are two links in that sentence; one to the Thiasos masterlist and one to the hymns for use with it. I looooooove the Dionysos hymn for so, so many reasons and really enjoy the others.

** You will notice links at the names of the deities, to provide helpful information on them above and beyond anything I have to say.

*** I can't help but think of Ogden's discussion on necromancy performed at “birdless caves” (mephitic caves) in
Greek and Roman Necromancy. Such places were considered especially linked to the underworld, hence triggering their becoming major locations for the practice.

Orpheus, I Choose You!

$
0
0
“Moreover, so much of music as is adapted to the sound of the voice and to the sense of hearing is granted to us for the sake of harmony; and harmony, which has motions akin to the revolutions of our souls, is not regarded by the intelligent votary of the Muses as given by them with a view to irrational pleasure, which is deemed to be the purpose of it in our day, but as meant to correct any discord which may have arisen in the courses of the soul, and to be our ally in bringing her into harmony and agreement with herself; and rhythm too was given by them for the same reason, on account of the irregular and graceless ways which prevail among mankind generally, and to help us against them.”
- Plato, Timaeus.
Nothing is Lost.
Robert Cochrane once posited that “nothing is ever lost,” and that ideas return again, wearing new guises. At the heart of the Enlightenment project, while the Renaissance was getting underway, this is precisely what occurred amongst some of the philosophers, magicians and mystics that made up part of the motley crew who would inspire the later magical revival of the Victorian period.
And at the heart of it all, at the moment between the pulse of that brilliant heart-beat, sits the ghost of Orpheus, wearing a new outfit and continuing to inspire those individuals long after the collapse of the Greek and Roman empires of antiquity.


Many thanks to Sannion for letting me write whatever the hell I wanted (within reason). I'll do my best to restrict my desire to write 'Gonzo Orphism' as best I possibly can.

These dialogues are riddled with hostility, and generally divisive overall. [EDITED]

$
0
0
"What happens if Dionysus’ ecstasy is not balanced by the tempering influence of Apollo’s cool rationality?"
- John Halstead.

What happens when we ignore the purificatory functions of ecstasy? What happens when we forget that Dionysos is not merely a god of ecstasy, but also of liberation - both temporally during life* - and after death? What happens when we pre-suppose a God associated with the arts, the Muses, and an ecstatic oracular center (the Delphic Oracle) is composed of 'cool rationality'? What happens when we forget that Apollo had ecstatic cults associated with him, such as the Hirpi Sorani? What happens when you ask inapt questions rather than read, say, the Orphic Hymns or translations of Orphic tablets and gold-leaf inscriptions and try to formulate an idea about the over-arching cosmology in which the cultists themselves felt they lived, and the literary bricollage which inherently aided them in their spiritual tasks?

What happens is that we end up with an easily reductive, simplistic view of the devotees to those Gods, and forget that even when one was devoted to a particular deity, that deity still existed within a rich tapestry that does, indeed, balance out quite nicely. It demonstrates the very Pantheon that Mr. Halstead reveres, but never bothered to look into. He need only have visited the Thiasos of the Starry Bull blog and hovered his mouse over "prayers" to have seen prayers to both Dionysos and Apollon, thereby invalidating his comparisons entirely.**

Even in the Orphic tablets and gold-leaf instructions for the Netherworld, we are presented with a vast array of Principalities and Powers, of which Bacchus plays a special role... But he is hardly alone:
You have just died and have just been born, thrice happy, on this day.
Tell Persephone that Bacchus himself has liberated you.
A bull, you leapt into the milk.
Swift, you leapt into the milk.
A ram, you fell into the milk.
You have wine, a happy privilege
and you will go under the earth, once you have accomplished the same
rites as the other happy ones.

—  L 7a-b Two tablets from Pelinna, 4th cent. B.C., 1st edition Tsantsanoglou and Parassoglou (1987) 3 ff. (From Bernabe & Christophe, Instructions for the Netherworld. P. 62)
 Or we could look here:
This is the work of Mnemosyne. When he is on the point of dying
Toward the well-build abode of Hades, on the Right there is a Fountain,
And near it, erect, a white cypress tree.
There the souls, when they go down, refresh themselves.
Don't come near this fountain!
But further on you will find, from the lake of Mnemosyne,
Water freshly flowing. On its banks there are guardians.
The will ask you, with sagacious discernment,
Why you are investigating the darkness of gloomy Hades.
Say: “I am a son of Earth and Starry Heaven;
I am dry with thirst and dying. Give me, then, right away,
Fresh water to drink from the lake of Mnemosyne.”
And to be sure, they will consult the Subterranean Queen,
And they will give you water to drink from the lake of Mnemosyne,
So that once you have drunk, you too will go along the Sacred Way,
By which the other mystai and bacchoi advance, glorious.”
- Tablet from Hipponion (c. 400 BCE). Museo Archeologico Statale di Vibo. First edition, Pugliese Carratelli (1974) 108 f. (ibid, P.8)
Halstead writes:
"Fortunately, not all Pagan priests identify so completely with the object of their devotion, and not all deities are as destructive as Dionysus.  But, as a Jungian Neo-Pagan*, I think the danger is always there in focusing exclusively on one god or goddess."
And yet he remains in the dark, apparently incapable of using either Google, or academic texts, to see if any of his assumptions are even remotely correct. Which, ultimately, is why these dialogues are riddled with hostility, and generally divisive overall. But even then, I can forgive Mr. Halstead for the flaws inherent in his comments, because he is neither involved with Bacchic Orphism, nor has he probably been exposed to the idea that we worship more than one god. The problem remains that he could have bothered to make sure he was on the mark before he wrote his column, rather than instead cherry-picking troublesome elements from a dispersion of blog entries that he imagined sufficed for his task.

I, for one, invite Mr. Halstead to become a Child of Earth and Starry Heaven, or at least take the time to contemplate the ramifications of such a statement. For within that statement of being is something I think a Jungian Neo-Pagan could agree with.

* Dionysos is the cause of release, whence the god is also called Lusios. And Orpheus says: “Men performing rituals will send hekatombs in every season throughout the year and celebrate festivals, seeking release from lawless ancestors. You, having power over them, whomever you wish you will release from harsh toil and the unending goad.”
- Damascius, Commentary on the Phaedo 1.11 
** I was incorrect in assuming a prayer to Apollo Soranus had already been written, and made the same mistake that I criticize Mr. Halstead for. This was a major failboat on my part.So I suggest anyone who balks at my tone - which could have been better (I was intensely irritated to see Dionysos characterized as a 'destructive god' in an overly simplistic fashion) - take my hyperbolic annoyance with a grain of salt. We all make mistakes, and I should just let Mr. Halstead be. Which, henceforth, I shall. But seriously, we do venerate Apollo.

Half-mad field report, from 2013 - 2014.

$
0
0
"I had been randomly wandering around, and found myself thinking on Crowley (in particular, John St. John) and looked down… To see what you see here. It was so shocking I stopped, took a photo, and then came back home.
I just happened to have some stones carved to look like scarabs, and with hieroglyphs on them, over which some Golden Dawn practitioners had performed a modern version of The Opening of the Mouth. So I left one there with three cigarettes. It had been pretty delightful.”
- April 18th, 2013.

"They’re everywhere now. Almost every street corner has them in the immediate vicinity. You can find one on the edge of Hooker Hollow, along chunks of S St. On W. St.
Welcome to California. In addition to Mexican folk saints, we have this… I love this place.”
- July 8th, 2014.

A Feast For Dead Kings

$
0
0
And Those Who Might Have Been...


While Sannion was discussing the Feast of Dionysian Kings, and how to proceed with it, he brought up medieval fairies and the notion that (some of) the Good Neighborsmight also show up. It occurred to me that I could adapt instructions for meeting with said neighbors via a feast from the Book of Treasure Spirits, which contains a partial transcription of Sloanemanuscripts 3824, dated 1649, and parts of Sloane MS 3825.

The section in question is as follows:
"These spirits may be also called upon as the other, in such places where Either they haunt or foremost frequent in, and the place which is appointed or set apart for action must be suffumigated with good Aromatic Odours, and a Clean Cloth spread on the Ground or a table nine foot Distant from the Circle, upon which there must be Either a Chicken or any Kind of small joint, or piece of meat handsomely Roasted, and a white mantle, a Basin or little Dish like a Coffee Dish of fair Running water, half a pint of Salt in a bottle, a bottle of Ale Containing a Quart, Some food and a pint of Cream in a Dish provided Ceremonies they are much pleased & delighted with; and doth allure them to friendly familiarity willingly & Readily fulfilling your desires &c: without much Difficulty, and some have used no Circle at all, to the Calling of these spirits, but only being Clean was heard and apparelled, sit at another table or place only Covered with Clean Linen Cloth, nine foot Distant & so invocate."
- The Book of Treasure Spirits, edited by David Rankine. P. 108-110.

I spent chunks of the day either gathering materials, or resting because I'd been running around in 107*F heat. During the resting periods I read some of
God Abandons Antonyby Constantine P. Cavafy as Sannion recommended and Texts for the Afterlife: Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tabletsby Fritz Graf and Sarah Iles Johnston.

Then came the final gathering of food stuff for the Feast, and returning home... At which point I returned home to see my “fuzzy buddy,” also known as my house cat, covered in blood. I promptly proceeded to freak out, which didn't seem to amuse him terribly much. In retrospect, I should've noticed that he wasn't acting wounded right away, but couldn't tell how much he'd been bitten in the obvious battle he'd had. A bit of cleaning, and monitoring and checking him out for a bit has revealed that he only got bit a few times on his back legs (and they've been cleaned, and are being monitored for infection), and the blood probably belonged to some other poor creature.

I shouldn't be surprised. One of the many things I love about Dionysos is his love of large cats, and their beauty in movement and bloodthirsty frenzy. None the less, it took like what felt like an hour to make sure he didn't need to be brought to the veterinarian. When all of that was sorted, it was time to begin cooking (and already being sleep deprived I was feeling mighty drained).


We ended up serving:
- An alteration of chicken cordon bleu. Instead of binding the breadcrumbs with eggs, honey was used. Ham was ditched for thick slices of applewood bacon, and provolone and swiss cheese rounded it out. I then baked it until the chicken was finished.
- Shrimp salad, with Monterey and Colby Jack cheese, and blue cheese salad dressing.
- Black and rich coffee.
- A vessel of cream.
- White Rum and Irish Whiskey (libations of which, after toasts and cheers, were also made though not called for).*
- White rum with pomegranate juice (and some other mixers, like sweet and sour mix).
- Hawaiian rolls (because they're sweet, and cooking was already a bit of a stressful situation, without also baking a bunch of things)

- Red Velvet cupcakes.

Alas because there wasn't any scallops and worthy pancetta, I didn't make wrapped scallops. (I'll do it next year, and invite more folks to join in the Feast!) It was on the menu, but didn't work out. I tried to spend key moments of the cooking stage praying to the retinue or meditating on some of the Dionysian Kings that Sannion mentioned. I'd hoped to be able to read Orphic Hymns while cooking, but the entire buildup to the feast involved so much chaos that I completely forgot until the end, which was unfortunate and is something I need to work on, even if I need to get outside the chaos of preparing a meal for a large group of people, spirits, and deities, and use that brief respite more productively.

We then sat down outside, as the heat died down, and laughed and talked while enjoying the food. Everyone liked my honeyed, cheese alloyed, and bacon infused chicken, and divination performed before bed indicated that the offerings were well received. Perhaps next time I'll have the time to roast a whole, honeyed chicken. But it seems like baking it worked out just fine.

My battle cat is fine, although he didn't seem to stop being “battle ready” for half the night. And earlier today I was given extra intoxicating substances for free, so I think everything worked out pretty well. I admittedly forgot to set out the salt, which I'll remember for the next time I adapt the technique, which I plan to do in a Feast for Oberon in October. I'll also make sure to offer ale rather than just liquor at the place(s) set for the spirits. No circle was set down, but there weren't any issues, either. All in all, by the end of the night everyone was talking and joking, and it was pretty beautiful and blissful considering the stress and chaos of the buildup.

I had fun. I'd like to thank the
Thiasos of the Starry Bull for another reason to experiment, have fun, and give devotion to the retinue of Dionysos and Ariadne, not to mention the vibrant Heroes and Kings who are swept into the wake of the deities. I'm also really thankful that despite coming home to a bloody cat, he was fine. If things hadn't been the way they were, I don't know what I'd have done... Except maybe that I'd have been cooking the meal at midnight or 2 AM, and no one would've shared it with me. All things told, there was chaos, stress, fear, and then bliss and the ability to finallyrelax.

Jack.

* “Why not wine?” I'm not a big wine fan, and divination indicated it was unnecessary if I used hard liquor instead while I made plans. I sometimes use mead as a substitute, but I'd already bought a lotof alcohol across the course of the day.

Making a Dionysos altar as a poor-ass motherfucker.*

$
0
0
From the earliest times man has experienced in the face with the penetrating eyes the truest manifestation of anthropomorphic or theriomorphic beings. This manifestation is sustained by the mask, which is that much more effective because it is nothing but surface. Because of this, it acts as the strongest symbol of presence. Its eyes, which stare straight ahead, cannot be avoided; its face, with its inexorable immobility, is quite different from other images which seem ready to move, to turn, to step back. Here there is nothing but encounter, from which there is no withdrawal – and immovable, spell-binding antipode. This must be our point of departure for understanding that the mask, which was always a sacred object, could be also put over a human face to depict the god or spirit who appears.

And yet this explains the significance of only half the phenomenon of the mask. The mask is pure confrontation – an antipode, and nothing else. It has no reverse side - “Spirits have no back,” the people say. It has nothing which might transcend this mighty moment of confrontation. It has, in other words, no complete existence either. It is the symbol and the manifestation of that which is simultaneously there and not there: that which is excruciating near, that which is completely absent – both in one reality...”
- Walter F. Otto, Dionysus: Myth and Cult.

1. Either purchase - or if that falls outside your monetary capacity, make - a mask. Understand: the mask is now The God. (So inscribing “Dionysos” on it isn’t a bad idea, add titles if you want.)

2. Place mask on flat surface (a table if possible; but a bookshelf, or any other surface will work). If you can find, or grow grapes, place graveleaves and ivy beneath it.

3. Add a bowl, into which you can pour libations. If getting wine is too hard, cool water will work. Additionally, honey makes a fantastic offering. It is easy and cheap to obtain.

4. Fumigate if possible - frankincense, myrrh, storax and a number of other incenses will work.

5. Pray. Alternatively: “Dance as prayer” works here, if you are able. Hold the hymn in your mind as you perform the dance, or recite it beforehand or afterward. If you are unable, poetry is an acceptable offering of devotion. So is writing stories, etc, etc, etc. Like, you aren’t precisely LIMITED in your means of devotion and devotional work.

6. Profit. (Prophet?)

 Notes:
- Since the mask is the primary altar piece and not heavy, it can be transported beyond the home. This means that if you can't do anything at home, you can take it elsewhere and do your devotional work in that great beyond known as the outside world.
- In fact, the altar can be completely innocuous when maintained in the house. It's really just a mask, and a bowl put aside for libations. I grow plants behind mine, to keep my altarspace "alive." For some reasons, spiders really love setting up shop around it.
- This isn't really an in and out for devotional work at altars, but just the most basic setup I've come up with - and the cheapest - in my own spiritual work.

* Keep in mind that I've lived in varying degrees of poverty (bastards aren't exactly going to end up with trust funds when they grow up), and "poor-ass motherfucker" is used more in the spirit of brotherly love from someone who has been there... Rather than as an insult directed at those with less than myself.



In a few hours...

$
0
0

I'm pretty sure it'll be good times. Here's hopin' I don't make an ass out of myself!

Jack.

Treasures of the Earth (Part One.)

$
0
0

If we're to make heads or tails of the practice of Treasure Magic (and the many intersections it has with other topics, which range from pacts with fairies to Katabasis practices) then we ought to begin by establishing that it involves three topics (in order of utility):

1. Initiatic descents “Into the Earth” to deal with the Powers therein.
2. The discovery of the occulted nature of the sympathetic links between material components and magical practices, and the discovery of those materials.*
3. Discovering literal, buried treasures such as treasure troves of gold.

Between the Late Medieval and the Early Modern Period, these practices existed at all levels of social class. They appear in the Grimoires; they were occasionally practiced by lower class magicians, and they were used as tropes by charlatans to deceive the easily gullible. This last type of action comes into view with the memoirs of Cassanova:

In chapters XXIand XXIIof his memoirs, he recounts how he initially planned to rip off and seduce members of a family during one of his adventures, and creates a story about how he will get rid of spirits guarding treasure under their home. The entire episode goes awry when a fearsome storm strikes as he's performing his “magical” rituals, and he becomes convinced that the Wrath of God is upon him for his plan to seduce one of the daughters of the family. He ends up deciding not to seduce her, and that the entire episode was a bad idea.

But outside the rogues – of which there were many – there were individuals who we might conclude were sincere in their practices, whether it was for the discovery of literal troves of treasure or an attempt to make a pact with a fairy or spirit who would help them discover such things.


The Initiatic Descent / The Initiatic Ascent of the Spirit


At the tale end of the chapter wherein Reginald Scot discusses creating hazel wands for the act of money digging – a problem he claims has beguiled many a man – he briefly notes that there are “sundry receipts” for what we now call flying ointments that may be used when treasure is discovered. Flying ointments infact belong to a category of spellcraft we might call “catalepsy spells” or “soporific spells.” They date back to antiquity: when Circe drugs Odysseus's companions with wine in
The Odysseywe are certainlyseeing a mythical version of catalepsy spells. They appear in the Papyri Demoticus Magicae(PDM hereafter):

Another,if you wish to make a man sleep for twodays: mandrake root, 1 ounce, water and honey, 1 ounce, henbane, 1 ounce, Ivy, 1 ounce. Yo should grind them with a lok-measure of wine. If you wish to do it cleverly, you should put four portions to each one of them with a glass of wine; you should miosten them from morning to evening, you should clarify them; and you should make them drink it. [It is] very good.”
- PDM xiv. 716-24, (Another) “To Cause Evil Sleep.”

Sometime between late antiquity and the medieval period, these forms of spells began to be used on oneself rather than one's enemies. How precisely this occurred is something I have yet to work out. But flying ointments, soporific (“sleep inducing”) candles, and the like became both a part of folklore and magical practices. In the context of Treasure Magic rites, they are used to procure the powers of Spirit Flight and enter the Otherworld. Outside this context, they were still used on others, however. In Germany there was a tradition of creating “Thieves' Lights.” These were candles made from the fingers of unbaptized children, which allowed the user to “see in the dark,” “open all locked doors,” and even reduce those that saw them to sleep. Perhaps the best known form of this is one of the variants of the Hand of Glory, which Ingoldsby discusses in The Nurse's Tale:

“Open, lock,
To the Dead Man's knock!
Fly, bolt, and bar, and band!
Nor move, nor swerve,
Joint, muscle, or nerve,
At the spell of the Dead Man's hand!
Sleep, all who sleep! -- Wake, all who wake!
But be as the dead for the Dead Man's sake!

Now lock, nor bolt, nor bar avails,
Nor stout oak panel thick-studded with nails.
Heavy and harsh the hinges creak,
Though they had been oil'd in the course of the week.
The door opens wide as wide may be,
And there they stand,
That murderous band,
Lit by the light of the Glorious Hand,
By one! – by two! – by three! ”
- Tom Ingoldsby, The Hand of Glory.

While these talismans could certainly be put to criminal use – and indeed were associated specifically with criminal forms of magic, not to mention the outright criminality of witchcraft – they were also Treasure Magic talismans. This comes into view when we look at the other variant of the Hand of Glory, which is a shaped form of the Mandragora Officinarumthat was treated as a familiar spirit, given a house, and fed regularly. (For more information, see this entry.) If it received money, it would double it and effectively keep one from being poverty stricken.

Used in the context of the
initiatic descent, they would render one unconscious and allow one to interact with the spirits that guarded the Treasures of the Earth. Here again the idea that they could “unlock any door” points to the power of Spirit Flight, as one could pass through physical doors and the like “as if one was a ghost” without anyone being the wiser (except the spirits, that is, unless measures were taken)!

But this only accounts for some of the “ritual technology.” We also need to deal with the myths that fed into the practice, and the way they influenced it. During the Medieval period, there arrived in Germany, France, Spain and Italy groups of individuals who had been trained by the Church in clerical knowledge, but lacking a realistic use for these skills instead took to traveling widely. They were called the Clerici Vagantes, or “Wandering Scholars,” or “Traveling Scholars,” or simply as “vagrants.”

By the 16
thand 17thcenturies, they began claiming something quite odd. They claimed that they had been “to the Venusberg,” or to the (hollow) Mountain of Venus, seen fantastic sights therein, and returned with abilities that could both baffle and delight. In part, they are probably a huge part of the reason for the dispersion of myths and stories surrounding the Mountain of Venus. They wore yellow nets in place of cloaks, and for a small bit of coin would promise to influence the price of crops, to perform exorcisms against storms and hail, and even raise the specters of the “Furious Horde” (see also “Wild Hunt”) an extremely ancient Indo-European form of spirit procession that often involved a deity (Venus, Hekate, the Queen of the Fairies, Odin, Wodan, and many, many others) and the souls of dead warriors.

They would not be noteworthy were it not for the fact that other references to the Mountain of Venus arise out of Germany. There is at least one witch trial in which it occurs: the trial of Diel Bruell in the 17
thcentury. Poor Diel – and he is indeed poor – had suffered the loss of his family, and fallen asleep on a New Years Eve. He dreamed that he had traveled to the Mountain of Venus, where he saw – just as the Clerici Vaganteshad claimed to have seen – the Goddess of the Mountain, swarms of the dead in procession, a priest (probably a Necromancer), and many other things. He was executed for the practice of witchcraft in 1632 CE, and buried outside the church yard.

The tales of the Mountain of Venus entered Germany from Italy. They typically involved a fellow named Tannhauser, a fallen “minstrel Knight” or Minnesinger, who fell from Christianity and entered the Mountain of Venus voluntarily, where he became her companion. After a falling out with the Goddess, Tannhauser was believed to have left the Venus Mount and sought to be absolved of his sin by the Pope. This – highlighting the antagonism between Germanic Christianity and Catholicism – he was denied by the Pope and he eventually returned to stay with Venus forever in her Hollow Mountain Paradise.

Now during this era tales of entering hollow mountains, or hollow hills, and finding a paradise were not unknown. As an example, Jakob Grimm felt that the attribution of Venus in the story was a false one. He believed that the story was a simple alteration of a story wherein an lady Elf seduced a knight to come and live with her within the hollow hills of paradise. He was both right and wrong.

The tales trace back to Norcea where the Mountain of the Sibyl (which had long been associated with the practice of necromancy) was believed to exist. Arnold von Harff (1471 CE – 1505 CE) visited it during his travels:
Here at Noxea [Norcea] we heard tell of Dame Venus' Mount,” he begins, and ingenuously adds: “Since in our country so many wonderful things are told about it I prevailed upon my companions that they do me the favor to go a few miles out of the way to see this mountain out from Noxea and came to a little place called Arieet... Thence we went to a village called Norde. Close by lies Dame Venus' Mount, at one end of which is a castle. I quickly got acquainted with him and told him in Latin how we were minded to see the Mount of Dame Venus since in our country so many wonders were told about it. The castellan began to laugh at me and entertained us well that evening. In the morning early he rode with us to the mountain. In it were hewn holes as in the Vackleberch or at Triecht; from these the town and castle had been built. I accompanied him into these holes. I could see nothing there except that some of them were fallen in and some were still open. With the castellan we then left the mount and he took us to the castle as his guests, where he entertained us during noontime. After noon he rode with us up to the top of this mountain. Here was a small quiet lake. By it stood a little chapel, like a place of worship, and inside was a small altar and there, as he related to us, in earlier times when the art of necromancy was still abroad in the world, its devotees came and conjured up the devil and practiced the black art. So soon as this happened there always arose from the waters of the little lake a cloud which descended in a thunderstorm, drenching the whole land thereabouts for six leagues so that there was no grain there that year. Now the people would no longer suffer this and made complaint to the owner of the castle. He immediately had erected an upright gallows between the chapel and the lake and forbade that any one should ever practice necromancy any more upon the altar. Whoever did so was hanged on the gallows. The castellan gave us this account and then said he know of nothing else concerning the place, whereupon we took our leave of him and went to Fossata to our rightful road. This castle lies nine leagues from Noxea.”
- Philip Stephen Barto, Tannhäuser and the Venusberg. (1913 CE. P. 25)


Furthermore a fellow named Antoine de la Sale had attempted to enter the Venusberg, as well. He drew a picture of the mountain, which I've posted many times, but is worth showing here:
 
The most alarming part of all of this is that we can also connect the descent into the Sibyllenberg (“Mountain of the Sibyl”) to the Fairy Sibylia rite found in Reginald Scot's
Discoverie of Witchcraft. In fact, some of the ritual actions taken during the rite are done to avoid the more unpleasant aspects of the myths of the Mountain of Venus and the Mountain of the Sibyl: one first acquires the aid of one of the Restless Dead, and then employs that spiritto bring the “virgin Fairy Sibylia” to the magician. This is done precisely to avoid becoming trapped in the fairy's world: the very fate that happened to Tannhauser himself. In this case, the ritual is one of “Ascent:” the Fairy is brought forth out of the Underworld, or the Otherworld of the Fairies, rather than one venturing inside that world.

This isn't anything new. In the Catabasis myths and rites of antiquity, the spirits that existed in the Underworld were thought to be capable of holding one there. In fact, with nothing more than a gesture, a ghost was believed to be able to trap one within the Underworld
while their body was still ostensibly alive. Venturing into the Underworld was a capacity that only those who “knew how to make their way” could perform:
Parallels in the Greek catabasis literature, however, show that the phrase points to a situation in the netherworld, where visitors must expect sudden attacks by underworld demons in charge of the punishments. Protection against such attacks is advisable for those who dare enter the land of Hades, whether as visitors or on that last journey of the soul. […]
Such situations in which a frightful demon “comes close” are known from the catabasis myths. Plutarch's myth of Thespesius, De sera num. 567 A, provides a good example. At the crucial moment of his trip to the nether-world, Thespesius's friendly guide has suddenly disappeared, and approaching are "certain others of frightful aspect, who thrust him forward, giving him to understand that he was under compulsion to pass that way" (that is, to the place of punishment).”
- Hans Deiter Betz, Fragments of a Catabasis Ritual in a Greek Magical Papyrus.


The ritual that Betz refers to is
PGM LXX. 4 – 25, which contains apotropaic spells against ghosts when they approach. In them, the magician identifies as Hekate and proceeds to declare a series of symbols most likely first shown to him or her during initiatic rituals (“Ereschigal, virgin, bitch, serpent, wreath, key, herald's wand, golden sandal of the Lady of Tartarus”) followed by proceeding to speak Voces Magicae(“magical words”) to the spirit to ward it off and keep it from carrying one away to be judged in the Land of the Deadwhile still alive. Adding to this, one also had to be able to navigate in that place. Normal sense of direction was muddled, and normal associations of colors were tricky. (For example, see the White Cypress referenced in certain Orphic tablets.)

The desire to ward off the wrath of the dead during such descents also appears in the
Grimorium Verum, in a Treasure Magic rite in which Cerberus (who helps the magician navigate the terrain of the Otherworld, thereby making movement easier) – as ordered by Lucifer – leads one to treasure. There one encounters the guardian spirit of the treasure:


Your steps on his, you will arrive near the treasure, where the shade of a dead person will be waiting, namely, the person who hid the treasure, and he will want to fling himself on you. It will quickly be necessary to trace a circle with the wand and throw a coin, and shout to the shade:

Hitherto you shall come, and shall go no further! I will it, I command it, Amen!

Later, the author of the ritual warns:
“You must beware not to turn, and especially not to face any noise behind you, or beneath your feet, or to your sides, because flashing the air with lightning, and making the earth tremble, are all part of the trickery of the shade of the dead one, to make you lose your chance to obtain the treasure.
It is necessary, therefore, that you arm yourselves with courage, and not let yourselves be caught up with their fears, for the spirit will take you back to the place where you first invoked it, to convene for a second pact.
(Grimorium Verum, Peterson translation. “For the Discovery of a Treasure.” P. 67 – 69.)
Here we see an explicit reference to the capacity of the magician to achieve this act, not through his or her “will,” but rather through their alliance with Superior Spiritsof the Otherworld. Without the initiatic aspcts of the Pact, one is sure to fall prey to the power of ghosts, or to the powers of the Rulers of the Otherworld. Only with them at one's side, can one successfully hope to enter their world and move about with freedom. And even then, one cannot look backand be caught up in fear (like Orpheus was when he failed to free his beloved wife). This shows a clear line of practice from deep antiquity (the Myths of Orpheus, and the sorcerous act of not looking back) and the Early Modern and Late Medieval Periods, where these ideas extended to the domain of fairies andthe dead.


* The
defenseof those materials, such as when the Benandantimade Otherworld descents and then “fought witches” to defend the fertility of the crops is something which ties in to the overall subject, but is not an explicit aspect of most Treasure Magic rites.

The Treasure Hunt

$
0
0

“What’s that he holds?”
“A scrying mirror.”
“A what? His what?”
“An occult tool. A means for telling the past, present, perhaps even the future. He must have utilised some diabolical method to conceal his presence in the field. That is why he was not visible.”
“You think he sees what an arsehole he looks, standing there like the King himself?”
“No.”
— Ben Wheatley's A Field in England.

Last night, VVF and I sat down to watch Ben Wheatley's A Field in Englandwhich can be best described as “a psychedelic horror movie” in which three men and one accomplice become caught up in the intrigues of a dangerous wizard during the English civil war. It was not – at all – what I was expecting. But it was still marvelous.

One of the major driving elements of the movie is – besides amanita muscaria in potentially dangerous doses – a favorite subject of mine: treasure magic. The men are told that somewhere, buried in the field, is a hidden and buried treasure.

In the Discoverie of Witchcraft, Reginald Scot writes of:
How many have been bewitched with dreams, and thereby made to consume themselves with digging and searching for money, & etc.: whereof they, or some other have dreamed? I myself could manifest as having, known how wise men have been that way abused by very simple persons, even where no dream hath beene met withall, but waking dreams. And this has been used heretofore, as one of the finest cousening feats: in so much as there is a very formal art thereof devised, with many excellent superstitions and ceremonies thereunto belonging, which I will set down as breefly as may be.”
(Discoverie of Witchcraft, “
How men have beene bewitched, cousened or abused by dreames to dig and search for monie [money].”)

Scot goes on to recount some of the ceremonies of such magical endeavors, and they are fascinating: the use of hazel wands (known sometimes as “wishing wands” which are essentially identical to the hazel dowsing rods used in Early Modern German mining), prayers and evocations of spirits, divining to find ideal locations for such pursuits.

In the Early Modern period, treasure magic was everywhere. Once you know how to look for it, you can't stop seeing it: it appears in the Grimoires, in tales of the intrigues of cunning-folk, and even in the ribald stories of out-and-out charlatans. In the Memoirs of Cassanova, the womanizer and adventurer sets aside two chapters in which he recounts a startling tale. In his tale, he recounts how he convinced a well-to-do family that they had buried treasure on their property. It is all part of his conartistry, however, and Cassanova primarily intends to bed the family's daughters. He convinces them to sew for him magical robes, and eventually proceeds out to practice a magical ritual that he intends to have “fail” (so that he can finish his seduction routine and then presumably flee the area in his typical fashion). The ritual goes pearshaped when an enormous storm arrives towards the climax. Cassanova is overcome:
Such a storm was a very natural occurrence, and I had no reason to be astonished at it, but somehow, fear was beginning to creep into me, and I wished myself in my room. My fright soon increased at the sight of the lightning, and on hearing the claps of thunder which succeeded each other with fearful rapidity and seemed to roar over my very head. I then realized what extraordinary effect fear can have on the mind, for I fancied that, if I was not annihilated by the fires of heaven which were flashing all around me, it was only because they could not enter my magic ring. Thus was I admiring my own deceitful work! That foolish reason prevented me from leaving the circle in spite of the fear which caused me to shudder. If it had not been for that belief, the result of a cowardly fright, I would not have remained one minute where I was, and my hurried flight would no doubt have opened the eyes of my two dupes, who could not have failed to see that, far from being a magician, I was only a poltroon. The violence of the wind, the claps of thunder, the piercing cold, and above all, fear, made me tremble all over like an aspen leaf. My system, which I thought proof against every accident, had vanished: I acknowledged an avenging God who had waited for this opportunity of punishing me at one blow for all my sins, and of annihilating me, in order to put an end to my want of faith.The complete immobility which paralyzed all my limbs seemed to me a proof of the uselessness of my repentance, and that conviction only increased my consternation.”
(The Memoirs of Cassanova, Chapter 22. Italix mine.)
Subsequently, at the culmination of the rite he retires and decides not to pursue the family's chaste daughers further, nor continue with his fraudulent and decietful activities... At least at that residence, anyway. There is some hilarity here: one of the more common intersections with treasure magic is that of Jupiterian magic. Jupiter is – rightly – the sphere of the storm God (the Greek Zeus or Roman Jupiter), but who has been praised since ancient times as the dispenser of wealth. The Orphic Hymn to the Daimonpraises the deity:

Thee, mighty-ruling, Dæmon dread, I call, mild Jove [Zeus], life-giving, and the source of all:
Great Jove [Zeus], much-wand'ring, terrible and strong, to whom revenge and tortures dire belong.

Mankind from thee, in plenteous wealth abound, when in their dwellings joyful thou art found;
Or pass thro' life afflicted and distress'd, the needful means of bliss by thee supprest.
'Tis thine alone endu'd with boundless might, to keep the keys of sorrow and delight.
O holy, blessed father, hear my pray'r, disperse the seeds of life-consuming care;
With fav'ring mind the sacred rites attend, and grant my days a glorious, blessed end.”
(Hymn to the Daimon, Thomas Taylor translation. Italix mine.)

Similarly, the Key of Solomon describes a Jupiterian spirit, Parasiel, which is “the lord and master of treasures, and teacheth how to become possessor of places wherein they are” when discussing the First Pentacle of Solomon, and we shall return to the Pentacles of Solomonlater.

This is fitting – both to the narrative that Cassanova provides and to Ben Wheatley's amazing film – in that wealth, revenge, and tortures dire all belong to the terrifying power of Jupiter.

And of course, the annals of treasure magic and those who practiced it have no shortage of rogues even more dangerous and conniving than Cassanova. When Owen Davies discusses the act in Popular Magic: Cunning-folk in English History, he writes:
Treasure-seeking was one of those trades that led people to the doors of cunning-folk, people who in other circumstances would never have consulted them. In particular, cupidity brought together cunning-folk and the clergy, two groups who were otherwise in direct competition.” (P. 94)

We should also pause here to contemplate that not all engaged in the act were fraudulent practitioners. Many, however, certainly were:
Treasure seeking was a dangerous enterprise for cunning-folk to get involved in. With the exception of those who dug into Bronze Age barrows, the chances of finding buried treasure were exceedingly poor. As a result, many cunning-folk refrained from getting involved. […] Those, like Kingsbury, who took up the challenge were presumably either sincere in their quests and had faith in their magic, or were merely itinerant rogues who could disappear from the scene when the inevitable happened and nothing was found.” (P. 96)

Ben Wheatley's film does a fantastic job of capturing the atmosphere of what it might have been like to fall prey to such itinerant rogues! But one might ask the question of how they all came to exist in the first place, and the answer is rather surprising: these practices have a wide distribution outside popular magic. They exist in folk stories, such as this one:

“A Welshman is guided by an English cunning man/wizard to a hidden enchanted cavern leading deep underground. In this passage hangs a bell which must not be touched for, if it is, the inhabitants of the subterranean chamber will awake and ask 'Is it day?' If this happens the answer must be given 'No, sleep thou on', as the inhabitants of this cavern are the still-living Arthur and thousands of his men, asleep in a circle, waiting until the bell is tolled for them to rise and lead the Cymry to victory. Within the circle lay a heap of gold and a heap of silver and the Welshman is told by the magician that he can take from only one pile – this he does, but on his way out he accidentally strikes the bell, having to give the required answer in order to escape with his treasure. He is warned that he must not squander what he has stolen from the magical dwelling of Arthur, but when it is all spent he pays a second visit to the cavern. This time however he forgets to give the correct formula when he accidentally rings the bell and several knights awake, beat him, and send him forth a cripple. For the rest of his days he is poor and could never again find the entrance.”
(Taken from Caitlin R. Green's But Arthur's Grave is Nowhere Seen.)

They can also be found in magical manuscripts from the British Isles, such as Sloane MS 3824 and 3825 (which can be viewed in the edition that was edited and published by David Rankine as The Book of Treasure Spirits), Folger VB 26, the Grimoire of Arthur Gauntlet, and several other texts besides. Additionally one can find rites pertaining to treasure magic – or at least spirits which can tell one where treasure is hid – in more than a few of the grimoires. A number of these rituals coincide with working with fairies, who are also one of the types of spirits that were thought to guard buried treasure. The other types of spirit, of course, are ghosts and demons.

With such a wide dispersion of practices, it is rather startling that the subject isn't discussed half as often as one might expect. It is also surprising that, to the best of my knowledge, Wheatley's horror movie is the first of his kind: one can easily shape horror narratives involving ghosts, demons, and fairies and tie them together with the practice of treasure magic! But perhaps I shouldn't request more of such movies: being an American, if there is one thing I can count on Hollywood to do it is certainly to make terrible films from any subject matter along those lines.

In any event, the end of the film is jarring in comparison with the way it begins. At about the midpoint, psychedelic madness invades and permeates all the material to come afterward and intensity builds and builds on itself. This leads to – without wishing to spoil too much – one of the most fascinating “wizard battles” I have ever seen filmed in my life. One of the primary characters embraces his destiny as a magical practitioner, and is seen contemplating the spirit of the place– the dread guardian of the treasure that has been sought by his dangerous alter-ego – and proclaims that:

Look. An angel, mounting guard over the field's treasure!

This brings us back to magical materials involving such practices. Two items appear in the Key of Solomon, both fitting with the narrative of this blog entry:
The seventh and last pentacle of Jupiter. – It hath great power against poverty, if thou considerest it with devotion, repeating the versicle. It serveth furthermore to drive away those spirits who guard treasures, and to discover the same.”


Along with:
The fifth pentacle of Saturn. – This pentacle defendeth those who invoke the spirits of Saturn during the night; and chaseth away the spirits which guard treasures.”



The biggest concern of those who actually and ardently sought to conjure spirits to seek treasure, or simply sought treasure itself, was the spirits that guard it. These were ferocious chthonic spirits (or, as in the earlier legend, ancient knights that you don't want to piss off). They were dangerous enough that rituals to conjure and subsequently disarm them (presumably either through ordering them by divine names, or by displaying pentacles such as the above) involve requests one more frequently sees made to demons in the Grimoires:
[...]& we do again yet further by those present, & the efficacy, power & force thereof, Conjure, Command, Compel & constrain you all ye Spirits by name (as aforesaid) Sulphur, Chalcos, Anaboth, Sonenel, Barbaros, Gorson, (or Gorzon) Everges, Mureril, Vassago, Agares, Baramper, Barbasan, or some one, or any, or more of you, jointly & severally, to appear visibly, meekly & peaceably, in decent forms before us [….]”
(Sloane 3824, An Operation for Obtaining the Treasure Trove: The Invocation. From Rankine's The Book of Treasure Spirits, P. 30 – 47.)

This request to “appear visibly, meekly, and peacably” is frequently found in the grimoires where demons are conjured (and several of those abound in the above invocation!). The obvious reason is that such spirits can – and if they are angered
certainly will– appear in hostile forms, fumigating the area with hostile smells. One might again point to the event in Cassanova's fraudulent treasure rite: a storm which scares you shitless would not be an inapt occurance. Nor for that matter would hallucinating that the spirit has appeared in a hybrid form of man and beast and begun making threatening advances towards the circle.


Jake Stratton-Kent's first volume of The Geosophia has an account of a ritual – this time involving necromancy rather than treasure-seeking (although he certainly discusses that in the same book!) – in which spirits do just that:
On the other hand the lad who was beneath the pentacle, in greatest terror said, there were a million of the fiercest men swarming round and threatening us. He said besides that four enormous giants had appeared, who were striving to force their way into the circle. All the while the necromancer, trembling with fright, endeavoured with mild and gentle persuasions to dismiss them. Vencenzio Romoli, who was trembling like a reed in the wind, looked after the perfumes. I, who was as much in fear as the rest, endeavoured to show less, and to inspire them all with the most marvellous courage; but the truth is that I thought myself a dead man on seeing the terror of the necromancer himself. The lad had placed his head between his knees, saying: we are all dead men.Again I said to the lad: These creatures are inferior to us, and what you see is but smoke and shadow, therefore raise your eyes.When he had raised them, he cried out again: The whole coliseum is in flames, and the fire is coming down upon us: and covering his face with his hands, he said again that he was dead, and that he could not endure the sight any longer...” (P. 6) (For a blog entry in which I discuss this event a bit more, see Daimonic Agencies. For more on treasure magic, see The Treasures of the Earth... Although, really, I need to finish those entries.)
All things told, Ben Wheatley's film certainly hits “the right spot.” It may be sadly lacking in manifesting spirits, but the terror and moments where magical realism and the events of the narrative overlap is practically perfect.
I could probably babble on and on about the subject of treasure magic, and the movie, but it seems to me best to stop here. Make sure to see it. And if you ever plan to pick up a hazel rod and wander about seeking treasure in earnest: feel free to drop me a line. Even if I can't join you in the adventure, I'd love to chat about it.
Be seeing you,
Jack.

Mournful Cries: Of Sorcerers & Spirits

$
0
0


Author's Note: This was originally a post up at the Starry Bull blog. I'm pretty sure the old blog has been pulled down since the group was reformatted (I wish you all the best!), and I'm posting it here so that people can still access it if they want to.

The Sorcerer
The professional practice of Goetia primarily arises out of the late archaic age of Greece, gaining momentum around 500 - 400 BCE. The word means “lamenting,” or “wailing,” and describes the actions of the professional (known as the Goes, which is commonly glossed as “sorcerer”)who was employed to deal with restless ghosts. Morton Smithwrites of it:

The common Greek word for ‘magician’ in Jesus’ time was goes(plural goetes). […] Here goetia(what goetesdo) is one special technique like others named, a recognized and legitimate function. It seems to have been a sort of Greek shamanism, a form of mourning for the dead in which the goetesbecame ecstatic and were thought to accompany the dead on their journey to the underworld.”i

The word Goes – from which we get Goetia – has two primary etymological roots:

Goös: “a highly emotional funeral lament” performed by Greek women in antiquity. The opposite of the Threnos, an emotionally controlled form of lamentation.

In her excellent Restless Dead, Sarah Iles Johnston writes:
“Goös, in contrast, was spontaneous and emotionally powerful — sometimes excessively so. It is connected primarily with women, especially women who were related to the deceased. The songs these women sang emphasized their pain as survivors, and sometimes reproached the deceased for having left his family unprotected. In the Iliad, for example, Andromache describes to the dead Hector how Astyanax will have to beg for food at the tables of other men. Somewhat later, gooi began to carry the additional purpose of rousing the listeners to revenge; the singers did this by focusing not only on their own pain but also on the injustice of the death suffered by the deceased. Thus, the Chorus of lamenting women in the Choephoroi urges the listening Orestes to avenge his father’s death. Goös, in other words, became a means of eliciting help from the living, as well as a medium for complaining to the dead.

Rousing the living to action by complaining to the dead is but a step away from asking the dead themselves to bring help as well. Once the idea that the dead could be made to return had been introduced to Greek culture, it would have been natural to include such a request as part of a goös.”ii

Goao: “to lament, sing wildly, cast a spell.”

“The second phenomenon with which goetes regularly were connected was singing and more broadly music of all kinds. The Suda and Cosmas defined goeteiaas an act of “calling upon” (epiklesis) the dead; earlier sources repeatedly connected goeteia with the epoide, or chanted song. The Dactyls were credited both with the invention of various forms of music and with the composition of epoidai. Their student Orpheus, of course, was the most famous singer of all – by classical times we find him using his lyre and his voice to persuade the gods of the dead to release the soul of his wife, and by Varro’s day he was known as the author of a book called the Lyre, which taught others how to invoke souls through music as well. The crediting of such a book to Orpheus verifies that in ancient eyes what Orpheus did with his music was not really different from the way a goes used epoidaior the incantations written on curse tablets to call up a soul, even if Orpheus and the goes desired the souls they invoked for very different reasons. Broadly, all of these connections between invocation of souls and song are part of a belief in the ability of all kinds of sound to enchant the individual soul.
But we need not go so far afield in proving the importance of this association between goeteiaand song, for it is attested by the very term itself. As already noted, goes and its cognates are built from the same root as the older words goös and goao. This makes sense: the goes, like the lamenter, wishes to communicate with the realm of the dead…”iii

At the same time that the Greek city states were rising, and belief in the power of the dead was strengthened – possibly by contact with the Middle East and relevant beliefs in the dead in Mesopotamia and Egypt – local laws were enacted in a variety of regions which limited the performance of Goös and Threnos lamentations for the dead. While one could still travel to one of the major necromantic oracles (Acheron in Thesprotia, Avernus in Campania, Heracleia Pontica on the Black Sea, and Tainaron at the Mani peninsula),ivthis capability was not possessed by all members of the city states, and this situation helped pave the way for a type of itinerant magical tradesman – the Goes – to travel the ancient world, offering both ecstatic rites to deal with potential problems resulting from the wrathful dead (bringing them into the Underworld, where they could find rest), and even to offer a variety of other magical services, such as cursing enemies, that often involved the very same spirits and the spirits and deities that ruled them.

One crucial element that Sarah Iles Johnston, in agreement with more recent scholarship on the matter (as opposed to Smith's older work), is that Goetia and Mystery Initiation seem to overlap. The mystical companion – which is not to say that both roles could not be shared by some individuals – of the Goes was the Orpheo-telestai. Like the Goes, the Orpheo-telestai traveled the ancient world offering rites of purification that could be extended to both the ancestral, inherited guilt of family lines, and toward restless souls. Plato refers alludes to such mystical cultists in the Republicas follows:

Begging priests and prophets frequent the doors of the rich and persuade them that they possess a god-given power founded on sacrifices and incantations. If the rich person or any of his ancestors has committed an injustice, they can fix it with pleasant things and feasts. Moreover, if he wishes to injure some enemy, then, at little expense, he’ll be able to harm just and unjust alike, for by means of spells and enchantments they can persuade the gods to serve them. And they present a hubbub of books by Musaeus and Orpheus, offspring as they say of Selene and the Muses, according to which they arrange their rites, convincing not only individuals but also cities that liberation and purification from injustice is possible, both during life and after death, by means of sacrifices and enjoyable games to the deceased which free us from the evils of the beyond, whereas something horrible awaits those who have not celebrated sacrifices.”v

Additionally one group of Daimons commonly associated with Goetia – amongst many other things already mentioned by Johnston – and initiations is the Dactyls. Writing on the Dactyls, the Logographer Pherecydes of Leros, places them into two groups. Those of the Right Hand, who are Goetes (Binders); and those of the Left Hand, who are Analuontes (Releasers from Binding). The Dactyls were credited with teaching Orpheus the epoide, or chanted songs. These Daimons tend to be conflated with the Corybantes and Kouretes, and it is unclear where the distinctions between them begin and end. Regardless, even E.J. Harrison makes note of the hefty associations with rituals involving binding and the Dactyls:


“As daimons whether wholly or half divine the Kouretes have all manner of magical capacities. These capacities are by Strabo rather implied than expressly stated and are especially noticeable in their Phrygian equivalents, Korybantes. The Korybantes bind and release men from spells, they induce madness and heal it. The chorus asks the love-sick Phaedra:

“Is this some Spirit, O child of man?
Doth Hecat hold thee perchance, or Pan?
Doth She of the Mountains work her ban,
Or the dread Corybantes bind thee?” [….]”vi

This is not to suggest all of the Goes were Orphic mystery initiators, or that all Orphic purification specialists were Goes. Rather, in some cases, it seems increasingly clear that their spheres of action both interacted, and some were both. An excellent example of this is the sketch of Pharnabazos in Pharnabazos, the Diviner of Hermes: Two ostraka with curse letters from Olbiaby Andrei Lebedev:

“I propose the following explanation of the interrelation between the two graffiti. Pharnabazos and Aristoteles were two wandering priests, diviners and magicians working at the agora region of Olbia. They practiced divination, black magic and, presumably, purifications and initiations into mysteries for a fee [...]”

Earlier, Lebedev even suggested:
“Pharnabazos, then, seems to have been not only a diviner, but also a Bacchic priest, conceivably, an Orpheotelestes.”

Another such figure was Empedocles of Acagras (c. 492 – 432 BCE), who was widely credited as being a Goes (due to tales of his having raised the dead), his feats of wind-stopping and weather magic, and his indications that his capacities for such actions rested on his talent with poetry.



Rites of Goetia.

Appeasement:

“… prayers and sacrifices appease the souls, and the enchanting song of the magician is able to remove the daimones when they impede. Impeding daimones are revenging souls. This is why the magicians perform the sacrifice as if they were paying a penalty.On the offerings they pour water and milk, from which they make the libations, too. They sacrifice innumerable and many-knobbed cakes, because the souls, too, are innumerable.”vii

Acts of ritual appeasement for the dead were by no means limited to being practiced by sorcerers. In fact, there are a number of ritual actions made to appease the dead that fall outside the strict sphere of Goetia, but which are corollaries to it. One of these is the Deipna Hecatates, or Hekate's Supper:

... [T]he offerings laid at the crossroads every month for Hekate. Their purpose was to placate not only this dread goddess of the underworld, but also we learn from Plutarch (Moralia, 709 A), the Atropopaioi, i.e. the ghosts of those who for some reason cannot rest easy in their graves, and come back to earth in search of vengeance. An army of these invisible and maleficent beings follows in the wake of its leader as she roams at large through the midnight world.”viii

Likewise, common offerings discovered at graves such as toys, ritual gifts of certain types of flowers, and offerings of libations may be considered to have been done both out of goodwill, and to appease and placate the dead so as to keep them from becoming restless and hostile. An interesting collary to appeasement in Goetic rites would be acts of persuasion.In theGreek Magical Papyri(hereafter PGM), the spirits of the dead are often treated – rightly or wrongly – as secondary to the Daimons and Deities that rule them. Thus one finds phrases of flattery as a common component in many rites. For example, PGM IV. 2967 – 3006is a spell for picking a plant. In it, the plant itselfis praised as a series of Daimons and Gods:
You were sown by Kronos, you were conceived by Hera, / you were maintained by Ammon, you were given birth by Isis, you were nourished by Zeus the god of rain, you were given growth by Helios and dew. You [are] the dew of all the gods, you [are] the heart of Hermes, you are the seed of the primordial gods, you are the eye / of Helios, You are the light of Selene, you are the zeal of Osiris, you are the beauty and the glory of Ouranos, you are the soul of Osiris' daimon which revels in every place, you are the spirit of Ammon. As you have exalted Osiris, so / exalt yourself and rise just as Helios rises each day. Your size is equal to the zenith of Helios, your roots come from the depths, but your powers are in the heart of Hermes, your fibers are the bones of Mnevis, and your / flowers are the eye of Horus, your seed is Pan's seed. I am washing you in resin as I also wash the gods even [as I do this] for my own health. You also be cleaned by prayer and give us power as Ares and Athena do. I am Hermes. I am acquiring you with Good / Fortune and Good Daimon both at a propitious hour and on a propitious day that is effective for all things.”ix

This aspect of flattering the spirits is by no means limited to plants; in other rites lesser Daimones are praised as deities, and so forth. Goetes were often criticized for their powers of persuasion; to the point that by late antiquity, the word Goes was applied to those accused of Sophistry. Plato also refers to this use of flattery, when he complains in Laws of those who “are so bestial as to ... say that they can lead about the souls of the dead and... persuade the gods, pretending they can charm them by sacrifices and prayers and spells.”


Exorcism:

Exorcism and apotropaic charms and formulas to be used against hostile spirits go hand in hand, and the PGM is rife with them. Perhaps the best known ritual is PGM V. 96 – 172, better known as the Stele of Jeu the Hieroglyphist, or the “Headless God” ritual. That it functions as an exorcism is beyond question, with lines such as these:
I call upon you, awesome and invisible god with an empty spirit, AROGOGOROBRAŌ SOCHOU MODORIŌ PHALARCHAŌ OOO.Holy Headless One, deliver him, NN, from the daimon that restrains him, ROUBRIAŌ MARI ŌDAM BAABNABAŌTH ASS ADŌNAI APHNIAŌ ITHŌLETH ABRASAX AĒŌŌY;mighty Headless One, deliver him, NN, from the daimon which restrains him. MABARRAIŌ IOĒL KOTHA ATHORĒBALŌ ABRAŌTH, deliver him, NN, AŌTH ABRAŌTH BASYM ISAK SABAŌTH IAŌ.x

Whether or not the function of exorcism is its primary, or only, function is a matter that will probably be debated from now until the end of time. A similar ritual, to be used if approached by a hostile ghost, is PGM LXX. 4 – 25:

Charm of Hekate Ereschigal against fear of punishment.
/ If he [the ghost] comes forth, say to him: “I am Ereschigal, the one holding her thumbs, and not even one evil can befall her.”

If however, he comes close to you, take hold of your right heel and recite the following: “Ereshigal, virgin, bitch, serpent, wreath, key, herald’s wand, golden sandal of the Lady of Tartaros.” You will avert him.

ASKEI KATASKEI ERŌN OREŌN IŌR MEGA SAMNYĒR BAUI (3 times) PHROBANTIA SEMNĒ, I have been initiated, I went down into the underground chamber of the Dactyls, and I saw the other things down below, virgin, bitch, and all the rest.” Say it at a crossroad, turn around and flee, because it is at those places that she appears. Saying it late at night about what you wish, it will reveal it in your sleep; and if you are led away to death, say it while scattering the seeds of sesame, and it will save you.”xi

Writing on this particular ritual Jake Stratton-Kent notes:

The ASKEI KATASKEIformula is, as we would expect, attributed to the Dactyls; unusually the author refers to it as an Orphic formula. This, in my opinion, does not and cannot imply that this is an invocation of Orpheus; an interpretation made by Georg Luck in Arcana Mundi. Rather it simply conforms to the ancient idea that the rites of the Dactyls came under the tutelage of Orpheus, or as we might say, the Orphic movement.

On a practical level, it is plain that both this formula and the recital of the symbols of Hecate – from an authentic initiation ritual – are here magical devices for protection in a variety of underworld contexts. So too, the leaving of the site without looking back conforms to both the myth of Orpheus, and the magical preparations made by Jason for obtaining the Golden Fleece. Plainly, these are authentic and widely known gestures and practices, worthy of our attention in the modern context.”xii

 One particular benefit from the use of ritual exorcism is that spirits harming others could be – instead of taken into the underworld – driven to the crossroads, at which point they would become confused and “stuck” by the mix of places. This meant that the crossroad thus used was a place where other items could be brought, and other rites and incantations could be performed, where the dead would be compelled to act upon the magician's wishes.

Additionally several PGM rites make use of sculptures or icons that Daimons are bound to. These are probably alterations of Kolossoi, poppets that were used to deal with Hikesioi Apaktoi(hostile visitants). Kolossoicould be made to bind even deities (such as Ares) to locations for purposes of protection, or to bind hostile spirits that were visiting. Thus is is a very small step to end up at the ritual actions found in The Sword of Dardanos (PGM IV. 1716 – 1870), where it is used as part of a compulsive love spell:

“Take a magnetic stone which is breathing and engrave Aphrodite sitting astride Psyche I and with her left hand holding on her hair bound in curls. And above her head: “ACHMAGE KAKPEPSEI”; and below / Aphrodite and Psyche engrave Eros standing on the vault of heaven, holding a blazing torch and burning Psyche. And below Eros these I names: “ACHAPA ADŌNAIE BASMA CHARAKŌ IAKŌB IAŌ ĒPHARPHARĒI.” [...]”xiii

Compulsion:

The dead which remained outside the Underworld were subject to magical rites of compulsion; this is not to say that those within the Underworld could not be subjected to such procedures, but the fact that one did not need to evoke a given spirit out of the Underworld made certain types of rites more expedient. Compulsion came in multiple forms ranging from binding formulas as applied to the Kolossoito the use of the compulsive formulas in lead Defixionestablets for the purposes of curses.

A major subset of these rites are compulsive love spells; given that I don't want to be seen as encouraging such actions, I'll simply deal with this aspect in brief. Most compulsive love spells involving Goetia have two principle characteristics:
1. Petitioning the rulers of the dead (e.g. Hermes, Hecate, etc.) to compel one of the spirits to act on one's behalf.
2. Binding of a mortal individual to the spirit thus compelled, and directions given to the spirit to ensure that the individual falls in love with oneself, or one's client.

To be clear: these spells are a type of curse, and the actions that the spirit (most often a ghost) are directed to take fall in line with curses. For example PGM IV. 1390 – 1495, the “Love spell of attraction performed with the help of heroes, or gladiators, or those who have died a violent death,” has lines that read as follows:

“May bring success to him who is beset
With torments. You who've left the light, O you
Unfortunate ones, I bring success to him,
NN, who is distressed at heart because
Of her, NN, ungodly and unholy.
So bring her wracked with torment-and in haste.”xiv

To be clear – if you perform these rituals, you're an asshole. At the same time, it would be inapt to gloss over them and pretend that they were not offered to clients in antiquity, or did not exist. A huge chunk of the PGM rites dealing with the dead involve compelling them to torment some poor woman or another until she falls in love with the client. As distasteful as this may be, it is a byproduct of the view that they would respond to such formulas.

Similarly, the dead could also be compelled to assault one's enemies, tormenting them with madness, plaguing them with illness, and generally being a pain. Most of the Defixionestablets deal with such elements.

Ogden writes of:
The importance of tombs as sites for the exercise of control over ghosts is demonstrated by the many curse tablets (in Greek katadesmoi; in Latin defixiones) and voodoo dolls (in Greek kolossoi) deposited within them. The tablets were addressed to the ghosts within, who were required to achieve, by means direct or indirect, the curse described.”xv

Meanwhile, the investigation of ritual actions towards compelling the dead later come together when Ogden discusses the act of handing over a name to the dead, particularly when it came to the act of divining by the dead the death date of an Emperor in Rome:

But it may have been feared that making such inquiries of ghosts could in itself, paradoxically, hasten the point of his eath. Such inquirites may have been tantamount to cursing their subject, given that in the simplest form of binding curse, one merely handed over the name of one's chosen victims to a ghost.”xvi

This again corresponds to some of the simplest forms of binding curses for the purpose of love. In PGM XXXVI. 187 – 210one is instructed to write on a piece of unbaked pottery incantations to Triple Formed Hekate (who is acting in this manner as “The Demon of Love-Madness,” a title she obtained in late antiquity and which fueled such actions in the Deity's name), as well as the name of the individual to be bound to the ghosts... And as such be plagued until they fall in love. A number of pottery fragments, with names presumably given over to the dead, have been found at triplicate (triodos) crossroads. Whether these belong to curse rituals, or malevolent love-curses, is something I am, however, uncertain of.

Katabasis Rituals:

Katabasis rituals involved descents into the Underworld, to interact with the spirits that lived within that domain, as well as the the Deities of the Underworld. A visit to the Oracle of Trophonios, for example, involved a Katabasis format; individuals would have to be purified in diverse manners (ranging from animal sacrifice, to bathing without hot water), and then descended into a pit to deal with the Heroic Trophonios, and obtain necessary information. Like with so many other aspects of Goetia, it shares traits with views on Mystery Initiations. In Andromache Karanika's “Ecstasis in Healing: Practices in Southern Italy and Greece from Antiquity to the Present, the author notes:

“Plutarch (fr.178) describes an experience of the Underworld in terms of an initiation, for initiations were often staged as journeys to the world of the dead. In the 19th century, the first of the B-texts to come to the notice of scholars, i.e. 'Petelia', was associated with the oracle of Trophonios at Lebadeia in central Greece. According to Pausanias (ix.39), a man who wanted to consult this oracle had to descend into a chasm, having first taken a draught from the spring of Forgetfulness (Lethe) to obliterate his memory of the past and then another from the spring of Memory to remember what he would see in his descent. When he returned from the innermost cave that he had eventually been drawn into feet first, he was taken to the nearby throne of Memory where he was asked by priests what he had discovered about his future. Apart from the rather superficial point that at Lebadeia the oracle seeker had to drink water from both springs, there is an enormous difference between the two quests in the purpose of the descent and the function of the waters of Memory. At Lebadeia, a living man descends into an Underworld to witness and remember a revelation about the future; in the B-texts, the soul of an initiate descends into the Underworld to remember its past life (or lives). In ritual, and here we are again assuming that the Gold Leaves reflect the practices of initiation, the waters of Memory might 'be used to symbolize the initiate's training in memory or understanding of the cycle of reincarnations and the things she must do in this life to remedy or atone for past lives' (Edmonds, pp.107-08).”

In the earlier referencedPGM LXX. 4 – 25, the magician states: “I have been initiated, I went down into the underground chamber of the Dactyls, and I saw the other things down below, virgin, bitch, and all the rest.” The “underground chamber of the Dactyls,” those same spirits credited with being both Goetes and Releasers from Binding, and the meeting of the Virgin, are most likely allusions to performing the ritual after performing a Katabasisritual. Likewise, when we hear that Goetes became ecstatic and lead spirits of the dead into the Underworld, it is quite likely that they were performing Katabasisrites and using them to bring the spirits to where they needed to go.

Daimons and Familiars Spirits

The last area worth addressing for this (now ever increasing in length) blog entry prior to jumping ahead in time is the rituals which allowed a magician to acquire a spirit to serve him, or act as a tutelary guide. Of these sort there are a multitude; the first ritual found in the PGM (I. 1 – 42) is one to acquire a personal Daimon who acts as an advisor and instructor, and who after death “he will wrap [up] your body as befits a god, but he will take your spirit and carry it into the air with him.” It is worth noting that in this particular ritual, one will not go into the Underworld, but thereafter become an Aerial spirit like the Daimon attracted by the rite.

Of similar note is PGM IV. 2006 – 2125, “Pitys spell of attraction.” Here the skull of an individual is used, along with incantations and a variety of magical materia, to introduce a ghost to the power of Helios. Thereafter, with the blessing of Helios, the ghost becomes a type of magical companion or familiar spirit to the Goes and allows him to accomplish magical arts without the typical accoutrements of the practice: “Most of the magicians, who carried their instruments with them, even put them aside and used him as an assistant. And they accomplished the preceding things with all dispatch.”xvii



Medieval and Early Modern Goetia.

While it would take far too long – and this discussion on Goetia is already long enough in my opinion – to discuss all of the ways in which Medieval and later Goetia ties in with its roots, the practice itself did not die out in antiquity. Rather it mutated, re-emerging with peculiar strength between the late Medieval and Early Modern Period.

As it did in its earlier iterations, the affiliation between the practitioner and spirits who are associated with ruling the dead remains particularly tight. One of the rituals in Reginald Scot's The Discoverie of Witchcraft, entitled How to Raise Up the Ghost of One that hath Hanged Himselfblatantly conjures the ghost “By the mysteries of the deep, by the flames ofBanal, by the power of the East and the silence of the night, by the holy rites ofHecate [...]”. The ritual is performed to both enhance the capacity of the sorcerer – as the ghost instructs him on the finer details on where to find spirits and how to communicate with them – as well as offering, just as the Goes had in antiquity, the capacity to release said ghost from its afflicted state:

“Which Conjuration being thrice repeated, while the fire is burning with Mastick and Gum Aromatick, the body will begin to rise, and at last will stand upright before the Exorcist, answering with a faint and hollow voice, the questions proposed unto it. Why it strangled it self; where its dwelling is; what its food and life is; how long it will be ere it enter into rest, and by what means the Magitian may assist it to come to rest: Also, of the treasures of this world, where they are hid.”

Similarly, a restless ghost is employed so that the magician may make a pact with the Fairy Sibylia, once again with the ghost being promised peace from its state upon the conclusion of the pact with the Fairy. In this case, Sibylia represents the tutelary Sibyls, of which one was believed to have taught Aeneas the art of necromancy. The ritual which follows the Sibylia conjuration again involves requesting that the spirit teach one where to find “treasure hidden in the earth,” an extremely common exploit of necromancy in the early modern period.

As an example, one spirit found in a few of the Grimoires and spirit catalogs of the eras, is Naberius(Naberus; note that the spirit's name is subject to a variety different spellings). Weyer, in the Pseudomonarchia Daemonum, states that this spirit is Cerberus. In at least some versions of the Grimorium Verum (either Joseph H. Peterson's translation, or Jake Stratton-Kent's True Grimoire are worth picking up by those interested), the spirit is again associated with magical treasure hunting (see link for full transcription):

“A large black dog, with a splendid golden collar, will prevent you from entering and will gnash his teeth, sending sparks blazing like diamonds in sunlight. That one is a gnome, to which you must proceed to point the wand, repeating three times as follows:


CERBERUS, CERBERUS, CERBERUS! By this wand, show me the way to the treasure!
The dog will whine three times in reply, and will wrap its tail around your wand, to teach you where the treasures are.”xviii



iMorton Smith, Jesus the Magician. P. 70
iiSarah Iles Johnston, Restless Dead: Encounters between the Living and the Dead. P. 101.
iiiIbid, P. 111 – 112
ivDaniel Ogden, Greek and Roman Necromancy. P. 18
vPlato, Republic 2.364a–365b.
viE.J. Harrison, Themis. P. 26
viiDerveni Papyrus col. 6.1-11. Italix mine.
viiiThe Goddess Hekate, edited by Stephen Ronan. P. 57 – 61.
ixHans Deiter Betz, The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation: Volume One. P. 95
xIbid, P. 103.
xiIbid, P. P. 297 – 298.
xiiJake Stratton Kent, Geosophia: Volume 2. P. 58
xiiiBetz, P. 69.
xivIbid, P. 65.
xvOgden, P. 3.
xviIbid, P. 156.
xvii Betz, P. 74.
xviii Joseph H. Peterson, Grimorium Verum. P. 67 – 69.

Goeteia is for Suckers: Magic Lamps & Underworld Descents.

$
0
0


Jack's Note:While attempting to write an article on distinctions between ancient magic and religion, I've decided to blog about the areas where the two subjects coincide to illustrate that the line between the subjects was far more permeable, and far more interesting than many people realize. This is more for my own peace of mind – so I don't derail what little I have to say in the article – than for any other reason. I do hope, however, that long time readers of my blog find it interesting. Also, the title of this article exists primarily for my own amusement.

A Cult with Heavenly Lamps.

Between 1965 and 1970, an excavation by a team from University of Texas headed by James Wiseman made an interesting discovery in the ancient city of Corinth: it was an underground bath, filled to the brim with terra-cotta lamps!

The excavators took to calling the remains the Fountain of the Lamps, and all things told they found over four thousand of the lamps. David Jordan, in his excellent article Inscribed Lamps from a Cult at Corinth in Late Antiquity, writes:

“The strikingly large number of lamps suggested to the excavators some after-dark cult that evidently practiced there for almost a hundred years until around the middle of the sixth century, when either an earth-quake or human efforts sealed off the entrance to the room. […] Four of the lamps have graffiti, the texts of which, as published by James Wiseman, invoke angels and Eros and mention Jesus and Jews. ”

We will return to Wiseman's inscribed lamps in time, but for now just let that information settle into the back of your mind.


Asklepios visits a dreamer at his temple.

Incubation.
“What did it mean for a real flesh-and-blood person in ancient Greece - not some Mythical or Legendary figure - to make a journey consciously, deliberately, knowingly into another world?

And in particularly: how could such a person go down or claim to go down into the world of death while still alive, touch the powers that live there, learn from them, and then come back to the world of the living?

The answer is extremely simple.

There was a specific and established technique among various groups of people for making the journey to the world of the dead; for dying before you died.

It involved isolating yourself in a dark place, lying down in complete stillness, staying motionless for hours or days. First the body would go silent, then eventually the mind. And this stillness is what gave access to another world, a world of utter paradox; to a totally different state of awareness. Sometimes that state was described as a kind of dream. Sometimes it was referred to as like a dream but not a dream, as really a third type of consciousness quite different from either waking or sleeping.

There used to be a whole technical language associated with the procedure; an entire mythical geography. And there was a name that the Greeks, and then the Romans, gave to this technique.
They called it Incubation.”
— Peter Kingsley, Reality. (P. 30 - 31.)

One might pause here to note that Kingsley has conflated Katabasis (“to go down”) rites aimed at the Underworld and Incubation, but the practices were readily interchangeable and this tendency can be at least apologized for. Despite this:

It was extremely wide spread and best associated with the cult of Asklepios, who made use of it for the purposes of healing. An excellent report on the 'dreams' provided by sleeping on the floor of Asklepios' temple is one such as this:

“(I dreamed) that I should proceed in the following way: first, mounting the chariot, I should go to the river which flows through the city and then, when I reached the spot where it leaves the city, I should perform the ἱερἀ ἐπιβόθρια [i.e., sacrifices in the ritual pits]; for thus he [s.c. Asclepius] named these rites. Having dug the pits, then, I should perform the sacred rites over them to whomever of the gods it is most fitting. Next, turning back and taking up small coins, I should cross the river and throw them away. And I believe he gave me some other instructions in addition to these. Afterwards, I should go to the holy shrine and offer perfect sacrificial animals to Asclepius and set up holy craters and distribute holy portions to all the fellow-pilgrims. And (he indicated) that it was also imperative to cut off part of the body itself in behalf of the safety of the whole. This, however, would be too great a demand, and from it he would exempt me. Instead, I should take off the ring which I was wearing and offer it to Telesphorus. For this would do the same as if I offered the finger itself. Furthermore, I should inscribe on the band of the ring “Son of Cronus.” After this there would be salvation.”
— Aristides, Oratio XLVIII. 27

Daniel Ogden notes that it was probably one of the most common psychic tactics for contacting ghosts (of all varieties) in the ancient world:

But what “really” happened after a consulter had performed his rites at the tomb? How did he experience the ghost? There is no direct evidence, but there is a strong circumstantial case for believing that he went to sleep and dreamed (“incubation”), perhaps on top of the tomb, and perhaps on the flece of the sheep that he had just jugulated for the ghost and immolated for the nether gods. Curiously, the Greeks and Romans tended to attribute the practice of incubation on the tombs of the ordinary dead to other races or religions, but in so doing at least demonstrated their familiarity with the custom. It is ascribed to the Libyan Nasamones (first by Herodotus) and Augilae, the Celts, and eventually, in the fifth century A.D., to the Christians and Jews. The Pythagorean Apollonius of Tyana's consultation of Achilles coincided with him spending the night on his barrow; Philostratus implies that he slept there (enucheusein). Plutarch's tale of the Pythagoreans discussed above may imply that Theanor slept at Lysis's tomb to receive his prophecy; Pythagoras had himself wittily affirmed that the dead spoke to the living in dreams. [...]”
— Ogden, Greek and Roman Necromancy. (P. 11.)

Later on, when discussing the tactic more extensively, he adds:
It is not surprising that ghosts should have been sought in dreams,since they often visited the living spontaneously in this way. This was, for example, how Patroclus appeared to Achilles in the Iliad, how Diapontius appeared to Philoaches in Plautus's Mostellaria, and how his dead son visited Epicrates in the first-century A.D. Nakrason in Asia Minor.”
— (Ibid, P. 75.)

To this we might add that the most likely event that took place when one approached the Trophonius'
katabastion(“place of descent”), was that following specific rites such as the offering honey-cakes to the snakes that inhabited the cavern, one most likely slept. Indeed, the situation becomes all the more interesting when one takes a glance over at Peter Kingsley's Realityand In the Dark Places of Wisdom. In both of those works he traces incubation practices to the cult of Apollo. In particular, he connects the practices to the Iatromantis and the cult of Apollo Oulios (“Apollo the Destroyer”; Kingsley indicates this can also be understood as “Apollo the Healer”)!

Iatromantis figures were a breed apart among the ancient Greeks.

They were specialists at invoking other states of awareness, in themselves and others.

And apart from being famous because of their poetry, one particularly technique they were well known for was the incantatory device of repeating the same words.

This point has very real significance. You may have noticed that at the start of his poem Parmenides keeps on repeating the same words over and over again.”
Kingsley, Reality(P. 34.)

By Kingsley contention – and I suspect his more correct than incorrect, his reliance on Harrison's
Themisaside – Parmenides proem is not merely a quaint story where a Goddess explains Reality Itself to a dumb mortal. It is far, far more: if Kingsley is correct, it is one of the most ancient Incubation reports we have available, and it demonstrates just how far the practices had spread. It was being used by those visiting necromantic oracles, by those incubating the ghosts of heroes on their tombs, by the cult of Asklepios, and by the Iatromantis figures who were adepts at incantatory poetry!

And there is another group who was using such rituals, one that long-time readers of this blog have probably already guessed about: the itinerant magicians and Goetes who wandered the ancient world.

Lamp (Corinth Type XXIV), 1st century A.D.
Ceramic. (Note: this is a lamp from Corinth, but not one of the inscribed ones discussed above and below.)

 Magic Lamps & Underworld Descents

There are a number of magical spells from the PGM for inspiring a 'direct vision.' These manipulate all manner of impliments to cause the spell to work, ranging from words written on leaves or recited over seeds, to inscribed magical lamps whose light inspires magical visions when one sleeps beneath them.

One of these that I have mentioned before occurs in PGM LXX. 4 – 25:

ASKEI KATASKEI ERŌN OREŌN IŌR MEGA SAMNYĒR BAUI (3 times) PHROBANTIA SEMNĒ, I have been initiated, I went down into the underground chamber of the Dactyls, and I saw the other things down below, virgin, bitch, and all the rest.” Say it at a crossroad, turn around and flee, because it is at those places that she appears. Saying it late at night about what you wish, it will reveal it in your sleep; and if you are led away to death, say it while scattering the seeds of sesame, and it will save you.”
— Betz, The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation(P. 297.)

Betz, in his
Fragments from a Catabasis Ritual in a Greek Magical Papyrus, suggests that it fell into magical hands through the mystery schools and that it has Orphic elements. This, rather than Georg Luck's suggestion that it may be an invocation of Orpheus, seems rather likely.

Of key note are the lines:
“Saying it late at night about what you wish, it will reveal it in your sleep; and if you are led away to death, say it while scattering the seeds of sesame, and it will save you.”

In conjunction with these lines, Betz himself states that:
“Parallels in the Greek catabasis literature, however, show that the phrase points to a situation in the netherworld, where visitors must expect sudden attacks by underworld demons in charge of the punishments. Protection against such attacks is advisable for those who dare enter the land of Hades, whether as visitors or on that last journey of the soul. At the moment of such an attack, the operator is advised to identify himself with the goddess Ereschigal by pronouncing this formula [...]”
 We find a similar dual purpose in the inscriptions left behind at Corinth: some appear to be requests for benevolence and aid, while others themselves salute Deities and Angels:

The above is the first inscription, and not terribly interesting, despite the reference to Angels and water. I include it just for the sake of doing so, frankly.

The second, however, is far more fascinating and finds a direct parallel in the PGM:


This inscription, dedicated to Sabaoth (“Lord of the Hosts”) and the Angels is paralleled in PGM VII. 1009-16 (to be inscribed on Laurel leaves rather than on a lamp):

I call upon [you], SABAŌTH, Michael, Raphaeland you, [powerful archangel] Gabriel, do not [simply] pass by me [as you bring visions], but let one of you enter I and reveal [to me] concerning the NN matter, AIAI ACHĒNĒIAŌ.” Write these things [on leaves …] of laurel and place them by your head.“(“Divination By Means of a Boy.” Betz, P. 145)

The third and final inscription is one of the most intriguing, given that it falls outside the two above:



My suggestion as to what the cult was practicing, given the parallels, is that it was divine and angelic incubation using the lamps in the bath as mediatory devices. I could, of course, quote at least a dozen more PGM spells for the lamps (those with the time, check out PGM I. 262 - 347 for a lamp dedicated to Apollo that will allow you to summon heavenly gods and chthonic daimons”) comparisons and how they tie together, but it would become tedious and boring. Chances are, I will revisit this topic again, anyway.

Now, given the above: if we have early Christian cultists, magicians of varying stripes, and all manner of mystics and poetry fueled madmen performing incubation, katabasis descents and the like is this: where do we draw the line at what is 'religious' and what is 'magical'?

I'll return to this question again if I visit several other topics it occurs when I think about, but the question itself plagues me. Where did the lines between mysticism, religion, and magic get drawn? And, in light of actual historical evidence, do they appear to be nothing more than arbitrary lines in the sand to anyone else?

Be seeing you,
Jack.

The Devil You Know.

$
0
0
Image taken from Legend of the Witches. (1969)

“The Man in Black sometimes plays on a Pipe or Cittern and the Company dance. At last the Devil vanisheth, and all are carried to their several homes in a short space. At their parting, they say: 'A Boy! Merry meet, merry part.'”
- Christina Hole, A Mirror of Witchcraft. (Chp. 2: “Coven and Sabbat: III. Meetings in Somerset. [Glanvil.])

Or Maybe You Ought to Know Him.
A few weeks ago, Pat Mosley published an interesting blog entry on Patheos in which he presented the case “inviting Satan back to Wicca” which generated a few responses (see here, here, and here. EDIT: And HERE!I should note that I share certain opinions with Bro. B.) All things told: Mr. Mosley's perspective is fascinating and if you have not read the blog entry yet, please feel free to take some time and browse it before returning for my response.

More recently, Aaron Leitch has weighed in on the topic, largely flipping the discussion on its head, which I will return to in a bit.

Moses. With Horns. But still not a God.
He is a God. You Know, with Horns.”

Early responses I saw to Mr. Mosley's thoughts varied, but some of them in particular stood out. One of these was the oft-repeated phrase seen in various Facebook comments to the point of: “Satan is not myHorned God!”

This phrasing, and many subsequent notions revolving around the “Horned God,” poses problems for almost any debate on the matter. One of these is that the titular God with Horns is identified variously, both within British Traditional Wicca (hereafter BTW) covens, and the name of the God can vary depending on the Tradition, and outside it. Inside the BTW structure, there can be no doubt as to who we worship: we knowtheir names, and we shout their names and cry for joy and dance in their honor. But we've all taken oaths against revealingthese names to the outside public, thus creating the need for the shorthand abstraction: “The Horned God.”

But in doing so, we open ourselves up to interpretations that may range far outside what was initially anticipated. When identifying the “Horned God,” those who worship him may refer to any number of Gods and individuals ranging from Pan, to Cernunnos, or even Herne the Hunter (who, as far as I know, was not a God, but did have horns). Given enough time, someone will inevitably discover that medieval images of Moses sometimes depict him with horns, and he'll be shoe-horned into the role... But I digress.

Nonetheless, the role of the Horned God, as a “Intercessor” is important regardlessof who, specifically, the title refers to.


Even the Folk had Devils.

As I noted earlier, Mr. Leitch recently flipped the discussion on its head by arguing from a different train of thought as many of the others confronted by this debate. In his entry, he writes:
But then there is the folk Satan. The Satan of the common people, and the one described in the grimoires. He is very much akin to the Horned God of Wicca, the Lord of Nature and Spirits. He is the Man of the Crossroads, summoned for divinationand favors. He is the trickster. If you draw upon Biblical imagery for him, he is the angel who accuses you of wrongdoing on behalf of God (that’s right, he works for the Big Guy in the Bible) and offers temptations much as Pan did before him. Christian tradition actually establishes Satan as the “god of this world,” in charge of physical reality (again, working for God) until Christ comes to establish a new celestial kingdom.”

In doing so, he takes the discussion along a trajectory that I quite enjoy.




In her Cunning Folk and Familiar Spirits, Emma Wilby recounts the complaint of a clergyman from Scotland recorded in 1677 regarding a fairy familiar that:
the vulgar call white deviles, which possibly  have neither so much power nor malice as the black ones have, which served our great grandfathers under the names of Brouny, and Robin Goodfellow, and, to this day, make dayly service to severals in quality of familiars.” (P. 16. Emphasis mine.)
 There is a sudden, curious orbit that we can take in the early modern period: it appears that even fairies, those elemental spirits beloved and known by the common individual (Agrippa's “poor and mean men”) could be understood as a type of “devil,” although certainly not as terrible as the typical demons of the Christian world. If we follow the orbit, we shall come upon precisely the sort of “folk devil” we are looking for.

In 1598 a wandering Scottish healer from Aberdeenshire by the name of Andrew Man gave a series of curious confessions: that he had become the consort of the Queen of the Fairies, and in doing so had gained the power to heal various illness and to encounter myriad spirits. Amongst these spirits was what appears to be the most idiosyncratic interpretation of the Devil:

“He knew Satan by the name of Christsonday, believing him to be an angel, clad in white clothes, and God’s godson, even though the latter had a ‘thraw’, or quarrel, with God, and was the lover of the elfin queen. Christsonday had marked the third finger of Man’s right hand, presumably in proprietal fashion. Man reported that the Fairy Queen had control of the whole craft but that Christsonday was the ‘gudeman’ who held all power under God.Furthermore he had seen dead men in the company of these two supranaturals, among them Thomas Rymour and James IV. Christsonday had appeared in the form of a horse (‘staig’) while the queen and her attendants rode on white steeds, when she convened to receive the obscene kiss. The accused attested that elves or fairies adopted the shape and clothing of ordinary men, though they were mere shadows, but more vigorous than mortals, and could indulge in playing and dancing whenever they pleased. The queen could choose to be old or young, could appoint anyone she liked as king, and could make love with whomsoever she wished. Although Man apparently met the elves in a fine chamber he would find himself in a moss, or bog, the next morning, their candles and swords turned into grass and straws; he had no fear of these creatures since he had known them all his days.”
- Edward J. Cowan, “Witch Persecution and Folk Belief in Lowland Scotland: The Devil’s Decade.” (In Witchcraft and Belief in Early Modern Scotland, Edited by Julian Goodaire, Lauren Martin, & Joyce Miller. P. 84.)

We might dismiss this entire confession, except that this is not the only confession from Scotland in which “Christonday” appears: in 1597, Christine (Christian) Reid was accused of peddling witchcraft due to her ongoing problems with Aberdeenshire millers.

Cowan writes:
“Christian Reid told Walter Miller that he and his mill were bewitched but if he would pay her she would provide a remedy, at least for the mill, because she could do little for him personally. Miller pronounced that he was not so concerned about his own health as he was about the mill. Since his surname was Miller his family had presumably followed the craft for some generations and he was thus mindful that they should continue to do so in the future. Reid consulted a witch who urged her to scatter some sand upon the mill-stones and wheels in the name of God and Christsonday so that the mill would operate in the old manner. And so due to the wrecking of the machinery, meal was ground in the old, less efficient way, presumably by hand.”
(Ibid, P. 81. Emphasis mine.)

And finally there is the figure of Marion Grant:
“She knew the Devil as Christsonday, carnally as well as socially, and had often danced with him and with ‘Our Ladye, a fine woman’, clad in a white petticoat. Grant allegedly claimed that she could charm a sword to ensure that its owner would never be wounded. The swordsman needed to hold the naked blade in his right hand kissing the guard, and then to make three crosses on the road with the weapon, in the name of Father, Son, Holy Ghost and Christsonday, a ceremony learned from the last-named, who also advised of a protective spell involving a cross made of rowan, or mountain ash, placed on a person’s right shoulder, before he turned round three times invoking the same foursome. The dreaded Scudder gathered a number of ‘deid folks baines’ from the kirkyard at Dyce, washing them lightly in water which she used on the sick William Symmer. She then ordered William’s mother-in-law to cast the bones into the River Don, whereupon ‘the water rumbled as if all the hills had fallen therein’. Such accounts seem to fit well with the attributed locations of witches’ conventions, in kirkyards, or at crossroads, mounds, hills, cairns and waters.”
(Ibid, P. 88.)
If these trials reflect anything, they reflect that fact that folk beliefs in the dead and fairies had combined with (often misunderstood) Christian themes, and yet individuals continued doing what their predecessors had done before them: talking with the spirits, receiving their aid, and having them play the role of the “Interecessor,” mentioned earlier.

In this sense, the folk devil – be it a “white devil” that is a fairy, a figure such as Christonday, or the spirits in the Grimoires – has perhaps more to do with witchcraft than the practitioners of modern witchcraft are keen to accept.

And perhaps they also have more to offer us than one would at first suppose.


Be seeing you,
Faust.


May 9th: Lemuria & Lemuralia

$
0
0
Mosaic featuring Romulus and Remus.
“It is an equal crime to eat beans and the heads of one’s parents.”
- Horace.

“Wretches, utter wretches, keep your hands from beans!”
- Empedocles.
I believe that at the heart of it, ancestor worship is about revering “the good” in one's ancestors and emulating those actions out of reverence and deference.

And yet, I suspect, there is something else. One of the problems that is emblematic of of online debates about ancestor worship is a general “all or nothing” attitude that one sometimes encounters: either an individual seems to be expected to worship every ancestor they have ever had (because history is a series of blocks we all stand on?) on one end or one encounters those on the other side who declare that everyancestor they have ever had was a worthless bastard, and thus the practice is meaningless!

I find both attitudes to be deeply suspect. The latter issue I shall not discuss at length except to openly beg the question of: does anyone truly believe there is no one who has any redeeming elements in their entire genetic line and history? As for the earlier... Writing on the subject of belief in the dead, Lewis Bayles Patton comments that:

“Although, according to antique, the dead lost their physical powers, they lost none of their higher spiritual powers of knowledge, feeling, and will. Ancestors retained a keen interest in their posterity and actively intervened in their affairs. Enemies preserved their original hostility to their foes.”
(Spiritism and the Cult of the Dead in Antiquity. P. 4)
There is a question I feel inclined to ask: what does one do if their ancestor acts aggressively, as an enemy might? While it is easy to dismiss this possibility, there seems to be evidence that the ancients believed this could be the case:
“And Orpheus says: “Men performing rituals will send hekatombs in every season throughout the year and celebrate festivals, seeking release from lawless ancestors. [...]”
(Damascius, Commentary on the Phaedo1.11.)

Today marks the occasion of just such a festival for release from lawless ancestors: May 9th (as well as the 11th and 13th of May), known to the Romans as Lemuria or Lemuralia.I feel I should let Ovid speak directly as to the nature of the festival:

When from that day the Evening Star shall thrice have shown his beauteous face, and thrice the vanquished stars shall have retreated before Phoebus, there will be celebrated an olden rite, the nocturnal Lemuria: it will bring offerings to the silent ghosts. The year was formerly shorter, and the pious rites of purification (februa) were unknown, and thou, two-headed Janus, wast not the leader of the months. Yet even then people brought gifts to the ashes of the dead, as their due, and the grandson paid his respects to the tomb of his buried grandsire. It was the month of May, so named after our forefathers (maiores), and it still retains part of the ancient custom.”
(Fasti, Book V.)

Later, after discussing the rites that the paterfamilias was expected to perform on the date, he explains the origin of the Festival:
“Why the day was called Lemuria, and what is the origin of the name, escapes me; it is for some god to discover it. Son of the Pleiad, thou reverend master of the puissant wand, inform me: oft hast thou seen the palace of the Stygian Jove. At my prayer the Bearer of the Herald’s Staff (Caducifer) was come. Learn the cause of the name; the god himself made it known.

When Romulus had buried his brother’s ghost in the grave, and the obsequies had been paid to the too nimble Remus, unhappy Faustulus and Acca, with streaming hair, sprinkled the burnt bones with their tears. Then at twilight’s fall they sadly took the homeward way, and flung themselves on their hard couch, just as it was. The gory ghost of Remus seemed to stand at the bedside and to speak these words in a faint murmur: “Look on me, who shared the half, the full half of your tender care, behold what I am come to, and what I was of late! A little while ago I might have been the foremost of my people, if but the birds had assigned the throne to me. Now I am an empty wrath, escaped from the flames of the pyre; that is all that remains of the once great Remus. Alas, where is my father Mars? If only you spoke the truth, and it was he who sent the wild beast’s dugs to suckle the abandoned babes. A citizen’s rash hand undid him whom the she-wolf saved; O how far more merciful was she! Ferocious Celer, mayest thou yield up thy cruel soul through wounds, and pass like me all bloody underneath the earth! My brother willed not this: his love’s a match for mine: he let fall upon my death – ‘twas all he could – his tears. Pray him by your tears, by your fosterage, that he would celebrate a day by signal honour done to me.”

As the ghost gave this charge, they yearned to embrace him and stretched forth their arms; the slippery shade escaped the clasping hands. When the vision fled and carried slumber with it, the pair reported to the king his brother’s words. Romulus complied, and gave the name Remuria to the day on which due worship is paid to buried ancestors. In the course of ages the rough letter, which stood at the beginning of the name, was changed into the smooth; and soon the souls of the silent multitude were also called Lemures: that is the meaning of the word, that is the force of the expression. But the ancients shut the temples on these days, as even now you see them closed at the season sacred to the dead. The times are unsuitable for the marriage both of a widow and a maid: she who marries then, will not live long. For the same reason, if you give weight to proverbs, the people say bad women wed in May. But these three festivals fall about the same time, though not on three consecutive days.”
So the festival itself goes back to the foundation of Rome, following the slaying of Remus by Romulus. It is a day in which the dead, wronged or angered or not, are propitiated so that they might be kept from harming their line in the days that follow.

In many respects, I cannot help but compare Lemuria to the Greek festival of Anthesteria, although we are entirely lacking in Dionysian elements (at least as far as I can tell). While they both fall on different dates (although this may be due to calendar changes, as Ovid seems to suggest) the places where they overlap are fascinating: in addition to propitiating the dead and holding that the time of the festival was their time (as well as 'dangerous' or 'impure'), the Vestals made mola salsa: a flour-based salted cake, made from the first wheat harvested that year. I cannot help but compare that act to the creation of pottage offered to Hermes Kthonios during Anthesteria, although I acknowledge that they are different: the Vestals would use the mola salsa again during sacrifices at Vestalia and Lupercalia. However, the fact that the 'first wheat' was used seems similar to my mind of the pottage made during Chytroi, which often included the first fruits and grains. The final similarity between the two is that both Anthesteria and Lemuria were considered “unlucky,” although the Romans felt that these three days rendered the entire month of may unlucky (and especially bad for marriages).

Sign of the Fig.

 As for the performance of the rites, Ovid's directions are more or less straightforward:

“When midnight has come and lends silence to sleep, and dogs and all ye varied fowls are hushed, the worshipper who bears the olden rite in mind and fears the gods arises; no knots constrict his feet; and he makes a sign with his thumb in the middle of his closed fingers (the Sign of the Fig), lest in his silence an unsubstantial shade should meet him.

And after washing his hands clean in spring water, he turns, and first he receives black beans and throws them away with face averted; but while he throws them, he says: “Haec ego emitto; his redimo meque meosque fabis.” (With these beans I redeem me and mine.)

This he says nine times, without looking back: the shade is thought to gather the beans, and to follow unseen behind. Again he touches water, and clashes Temesan bronze, and asks the shade to go out of his house. When he has said nine times, “Manes exite paterni!” (Ghost of my fathers, go forth!)
He looks back, and thinks that he has duly performed the sacred rites.”

On my end, I do not feel simply offering black beans to propitiate the ancestors is enough. The beans – which are a taboo object in certain cultures that associate them with the dead– are not all that I plan to offer, though. While I am perfectly content to propitiate and dismiss the more noxious ancestors, I find myself desiring to make honey-cakes for those ancestors who do their job. I am certainly not a Vestal virgin, and making mola salsa is perhaps not something I should do, but I still think even a festival such as this can include... less dramatic and fearful offerings. After all, it's what magicians do, and today is a good day to do it, I think.
“… prayers and sacrifices appease the souls, and the enchanting song of the magician is able to remove the daimones when they impede. Impeding daimones are revenging souls. This is why the magicians perform the sacrifice as if they were paying a penalty. On the offerings they pour water and milk, from which they make the libations, too. They sacrifice innumerable and many-knobbed cakes, because the souls, too, are innumerable.”
(The Derveni Papyrus.)

Be seeing you,
Faust.


Images, Amulets and Votives of the Danubian or Thracian Rider and the Great Goddess.

$
0
0
 
Thracian cavalry on a Greek vase.
WARNING: The author of this article is NOTa scholar of any kind. Any and all opinions expressed within are his own, and should not be mistaken for being authoritative in the least. He remains as perplexed as he was when he first encountered the Danubian / Thracian Rider votives, and as perplexed as ever regarding Thracian religion. Despite that, he hopes that some day he won't feel like a total idiot when attempting to parse these matters.

Heroized Gods and Great Goddesses
As individuals that follow me on other social media sites are probably aware: in recent months, I've been digging through the Campbell-Bonner magical gem database. Partially, this is to see what amulets correspond to spells and rituals in the Greek Magical Papyri, and how the voces magicaewere applied to gems.

But while digging through them, I encountered a few carved gemstones, similar to other magical gemstones and amulets from late antiquity, that I want to comment on. They correspond to votives and images found in Rome and Eastern Europe, often featuring a Hero or Deity on horseback, or a pair of Horsemen facing what may be called a 'Great Goddess.' If this interpretation seems a little hazy, it is because there is no scholarly consensus as to who either the Horsemen (or Horseman) or the Goddess specifically represent. As if this was not complicated enough, there appears to be multiple disagreements over which cultures they belong to. However, they include symbolism and motifs that can be found in votives and reliefs, among other things, from Asia Minor, or Anatolia (modern day Turkey), Eastern, Central, and Western Europe. And at the very least, we can get a glimpse of those parallels.

In this entry, though I have few over-reaching conclusions. I can only point to the images themselves, and what I feel is evident in some of them, and to relevant articles on the subject.


Images and possible amulets of a lone Rider

Images of the Thracian and Danubian horseman by himself can be found in and on Thracian tombs, such as these two images of the Riders in combat (or in a ritual dance emulating combat, depending on the interpretation) such as those found at the tomb discovered near Alexandrovo in the year 2000, and believed to have been closed and turned into a tomb (possibly after being a mystery cult site) between the 2ndand 3rdcenturies BCE. The image from the Southern wall is too damaged to be useful for our purposes, however the images over the Northern wall and Central Chamber are definitely worth taking a look at:

(Alexandrovo: Northern wall painting feating Thracian Horseman in combat or ritual. Source.)



(Alexandrovo: Wall painting over the central chamber. Source.)


Additionally, the Alexandrovo kurgan contains an image of the Thracian horseman, and a nude figure bearing a double-axe, in a hunting scene similar to those found on reliefs elsewhere:

(Alexandrovo: Central chamber fresco, depicting the Thracian horseman hunting a boar and possibly Zalmoxis wielding the Double-Axe. Source.)

One might compare it to a marble votive of the Thracian horseman, spear raised in the same position, dated to the 2ndor 3rdcentury (of the common era, I think?):

(Marble votive from Bulgaria. Source.)

A recent discovery, in Perperikon, Bulgaria, is a figurine of what is believed to by Apollo, wearing a Phrygian cap, with his arm positioned to throw a spear in the same style as those Rider votives that feature the hunting position.
(Apollo figurine from Perperikon.)


A number of those images I've consulted outside the gems have yielded inscriptions to Apollo, and sometimes even Asklepios (which we'll return to in a bit), and one cannot help but admire this relief made to Apollo-Sozon from about C.E. 225 – 250, from Anatolia / Asia Minor. In it, he bears both the Phrygian cap, and a Double-Axe similar to the nude figure from the Alexandrovo kurgan:

(Apollo-Sozon relief.)


One might compare it to the relief / frieze found at the Felix Romuliana in Serbia, in which the Horseman again appears to be carrying a Double-Axe:

(Felix Romuliana frieze. Source.)


Additionally, and I note and add these because they may play a role in syncretic images that appear later (such as St. George spearing the dragon), there are a series of gems in the Campbell-Bonner database that depict a singular horseman spearing a woman. These gems have been labeled variously as “Solomon spearing Lilith,” “the Holy Rider Spearing the Evil One,” and so forth. I cannot say for certain that they are not Judeo-Christian, but their style is reminiscent of the carved gemstones and amulets I will eventually get to and certainly belong with the Danubian Rider images:

(Gemstone: Rider on rearing horse spearing a female figure being trampled by his horse. 4thcentury CE. Source.)

(Gemstone: Pretty much the same as above, minus inscription on the back. 4Th- 5thcentury CE. Source.)


While I have limited myself to two images, there are at least a dozen of them in the depths of the database, all variously named, but all similar in images and motifs. I cannot prove in any form or fashion that they are linked to the others, but I strongly suspect that they are.

While the single rider can often be found hunting or in a ritual or battle, he can also sometimes simply be shown riding and making a gesture known as the Benedictio latino:

(Thracian rider from the Burgas museum in Bulgaria. 2ndcentury CE. Source.)

This gesture is important to note for later amulets and images, as it will appear again, but it is also seemingly associated with the Thracian cult of Sabazios specifically, and the votive hands that have been left behind and been called “the Hand of Sabazios,” such as this one from the British Museum:

(Hand of Sabazios from the British Museum. Source.)


Another of the above reliefs, this one from the 1stor 2ndcentury CE, is a grave relief featuring the Thracian Rider making the benedictio latina as he faces what I think is a tree with a giant snake wrapped around it:

(Thracian Rider. Source.)


Two Riders & a Great Goddess

There are also reliefs depicting two riders. One relief, found near Krupac, Yugoslavia, features two riders with what appears to be an altar featuring a coiled snake:

(Krupac figure. Source.)

Nora Demitrova comments that it is:

[...] a late-2nd century A.D. dedication to Apollo and Asklepios found in Krupac, in eastern Yugoslavia. The relief depicts two horseman facing each other […].”
Based on the inscription (which, frankly, I don't care to transcribe – see the PDF link above or view the article on the JSTOR link) she indicates:
“Thus one horseman is presumably Apollo, and the other Asklepios. The relief is most easily understood if we explain the rider as a convention for divinity of some kind, personalized by the inscription.”

It is particularly compelling because it contains both horsemen, which we begin to see in the votives for the Danubian Riders:

(Lead Danubian Rider votive. Belgrade museum. Source.)


These votives seem to include themes seen above in the Thracian and Danubian Rider images, as well as a central Goddess figure who has been variously argued to be the Celtic Goddess Epona, Artemis, Magna Mater, and probably at least four other Goddesses I don't even remember. The arguments back and forth seem to be somewhat furious, but it there does seem to be some overlap between the images of Epona feeding horses, and the Danubian Rider votives.

Take, for example, this relief image from Augustae, featuring both the Rider in a hunting position and the Goddess beneath, flanked by horses:

(Augustae relief. Source.)

And this image of Epona, enthroned, flanked by Horses:

(Epona relief. Source.)

Obviously, I do not intend to imply that the Goddess in the votives and reliefs and amulets is always Epona. I strongly suspect that she is always a 'Great Goddess,' that is a Goddess who rules the entire Sublunar realm, and that Epona is one of the syncretic strands the votives tie in to.

(Lead votive plaque for the Cult of the Danubian Rider. 1stcentury CE. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Source.)

(Lead icon of the Danubian Horsemen. Belgrade museum. Source.)


Finally, we come to the gemstones I encountered. Each of these has been interpreted as involving the Danubian / Thracian Riders, and Magna Mater. The riders, as on the votives above, flank and often make the Benedictio latinagesture to the Goddess. However they are also, as the single rider gems seen far above, show with their horses standing atop human bodies.

(Danubian Riders and Goddess. Venus Victrix on the reverse side. 2ndcentury CE. Source.)


(Goddess flanked by Riders wearing Phrygian caps. 3rdcentury CE. Source.)

(Danubian Riders, Goddess, animals, and busts of Selene and Helios. 2Nd- 3rdcentury CE. Source.)


And while I had hoped to make a few more comments and show a few more images, working on this entry has tired me out. So, at least if there is interest, I will have to return to writing about the subject and flashing images another day.

While I doubt anyone learned anything, I hope they at least appreciate the images.

Be seeing you,
Jack.
Viewing all 138 articles
Browse latest View live